Loimaala A, Sievänen H, Laukkanen R, Pärkkä J, Vuori I, Huikuri H
UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland.
Clin Physiol. 1999 Jan;19(1):84-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1999.00152.x.
Assessment of heart rate variability from 24-h recordings requires a high-quality Holter, expensive equipment and multistage processing of recordings. We compared a new personal computer-based digital QRS detector system with a Holter recorder, and found the two methods to be equally accurate in time and frequency domain measures of heart rate variability.
通过24小时记录评估心率变异性需要高质量的动态心电图仪、昂贵的设备以及对记录进行多阶段处理。我们将一种基于个人电脑的新型数字QRS波检测器系统与动态心电图记录仪进行了比较,发现这两种方法在心率变异性的时域和频域测量中同样准确。