Casati A, Fanelli G, Cedrati V, Berti M, Aldegheri G, Torri G
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Milan, Italy.
Anesth Analg. 1999 Mar;88(3):587-92. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199903000-00024.
The purpose of this investigation was to compare, in a prospective, double-blinded fashion, 0.5% and 0.75% ropivacaine with 2% mepivacaine to determine their effects on respiratory function during interscalene brachial plexus (IBP) anesthesia. With ethical committee approval and written, informed consent, 30 healthy patients presenting for elective shoulder capsuloplastic or acromioplastic procedures were randomized to receive IBP anesthesia by 20 mL of either 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 10), 0.75% ropivacaine (n = 10), or 2% mepivacaine (n = 10). Block onset time, pulmonary function variables, ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic motion (ultrasonographic evaluation), and first requirement of postoperative analgesic were evaluated. Surgical anesthesia (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and motor block of the shoulder joint) was achieved later with 0.5% ropivacaine than with either 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine (P < 0.05), whereas the first pain medication was requested later with both ropivacaine concentrations than with mepivacaine (P < 0.0005). No differences in quality of the block or patient acceptance were observed in the three groups. All 30 patients had ipsilateral hemidiaphragmatic paresis and large mean decreases in forced vital capacity (ropivacaine 0.5%: 40% +/- 17%, ropivacaine 0.75%: 41% +/- 22%, mepivacaine 2%: 39% +/- 21%) and forced expiratory volume at 1 s (ropivacaine 0.5%: 30% +/- 19%, ropivacaine 0.75%: 38% +/- 26%, mepivacaine 2%: 40% +/- 10%). We conclude that, when performing IBP anesthesia, 0.5% ropivacaine does not decrease the incidence of ipsilateral paresis of the hemidiaphragm compared with 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% mepivacaine.
During the first 30 min after placing interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia, 0.5% ropivacaine does not provide clinically relevant advantages in terms of pulmonary function changes compared with either 0.75% ropivacaine or 2% mepivacaine. However, 0.75% ropivacaine allows a short onset, similar to that of mepivacaine, with long postoperative analgesia.
本研究的目的是以前瞻性、双盲方式比较0.5%和0.75%罗哌卡因与2%甲哌卡因对肌间沟臂丛神经(IBP)麻醉期间呼吸功能的影响。经伦理委员会批准并获得书面知情同意后,30例拟行择期肩关节囊成形术或肩峰成形术的健康患者被随机分为三组,分别接受20 mL的0.5%罗哌卡因(n = 10)、0.75%罗哌卡因(n = 10)或2%甲哌卡因(n = 10)进行IBP麻醉。评估阻滞起效时间、肺功能指标、同侧半膈肌运动(超声评估)及术后首次镇痛需求。与0.75%罗哌卡因或2%甲哌卡因相比,0.5%罗哌卡因达到手术麻醉(C4至C7针刺觉丧失及肩关节运动阻滞)的时间更晚(P < 0.05),而两种浓度的罗哌卡因组术后首次使用镇痛药物的时间均晚于甲哌卡因组(P < 0.0005)。三组在阻滞质量或患者接受度方面未观察到差异。所有30例患者均出现同侧半膈肌麻痹,用力肺活量(0.5%罗哌卡因:40%±17%,0.75%罗哌卡因:41%±22%,2%甲哌卡因:39%±21%)和第1秒用力呼气量(0.5%罗哌卡因:30%±19%,0.75%罗哌卡因:38%±26%,2%甲哌卡因:40%±10%)均有较大幅度下降。我们得出结论,在进行IBP麻醉时,与0.75%罗哌卡因和2%甲哌卡因相比,0.5%罗哌卡因不会降低同侧半膈肌麻痹的发生率。
在肌间沟臂丛神经麻醉后的前30分钟内,与0.75%罗哌卡因或2%甲哌卡因相比,0.5%罗哌卡因在肺功能变化方面未显示出临床相关优势。然而,0.75%罗哌卡因起效迅速,与甲哌卡因相似,且术后镇痛时间长。