Hernandez J, Sabanegh E S
Department of Urology, Wilford Hall Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
J Urol. 1999 Apr;161(4):1153-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)61616-1.
We review the treatment outcomes for microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal and identify predictors for success.
We performed a retrospective review of our experience with microsurgical reconstruction in 41 men who underwent 1 or more prior unsuccessful vasectomy reversal procedures. Of these patients 20 underwent bilateral (16) or unilateral (4) vasoepididymostomy, 11 underwent bilateral (7) or unilateral (4) vasovasostomy and 10 underwent unilateral vasoepididymostomy with contralateral vasovasostomy. Postoperative followup consisted of serial semen analyses and telephone interviews.
Patency and pregnancy followup data were available in 33 and 31 patients, respectively. Five couples had ongoing uncorrected female factor infertility problems and were not included in pregnancy rate calculations. Mean obstructive interval was 10.6 years. Overall patency and pregnancy rates were 79 and 31%, respectively. Mean total motile sperm count for patients demonstrating patency at followup was 38.0 million. History of conception with the current partner was predictive of future conception with 4 of 5 nonremarried couples (80%) initiating a pregnancy versus 3 of 18 remarried couples (17%) (p = 0.006). Other factors, including smoking history and obstructive interval, did not correlate with postoperative success. Reconstruction with vasovasostomy on at least 1 side trended toward improved patency (p = 0.17) and pregnancy rates (p = 0.15), although they did not assume statistical significance.
Microsurgical reconstruction following failed vasectomy reversal is associated with high patency and moderate pregnancy rates at short-term followup. In our series previous conception with the current partner was predictive of future conception after reconstruction. Urologists performing repeat vasectomy reversal must be familiar with microsurgical techniques, since almost three-quarters of patients will require at least unilateral vasoepididymostomy.
我们回顾了输精管复通失败后显微外科重建的治疗结果,并确定成功的预测因素。
我们对41例曾接受1次或多次输精管复通手术但未成功的男性患者进行显微外科重建的经验进行了回顾性分析。其中,20例患者接受了双侧(16例)或单侧(4例)输精管附睾吻合术,11例患者接受了双侧(7例)或单侧(4例)输精管吻合术,10例患者接受了单侧输精管附睾吻合术并同期行对侧输精管吻合术。术后随访包括系列精液分析和电话访谈。
分别有33例和31例患者获得了通畅情况及妊娠随访数据。5对夫妇存在未纠正的女方因素不孕问题,未纳入妊娠率计算。平均梗阻时间为10.6年。总体通畅率和妊娠率分别为79%和31%。随访时显示通畅的患者平均总活动精子数为3800万。与现任伴侣有过受孕史可预测未来受孕情况,5对未再婚夫妇中有4对(80%)成功受孕,而18对再婚夫妇中仅有3对(17%)成功受孕(p = 0.006)。其他因素,包括吸烟史和梗阻时间,与术后成功率无关。至少一侧行输精管吻合术的重建方式有提高通畅率(p = 0.17)和妊娠率(p = 0.15)的趋势,尽管未达到统计学意义。
输精管复通失败后的显微外科重建在短期随访中具有较高的通畅率和中等的妊娠率。在我们的系列研究中,与现任伴侣既往有过受孕史可预测重建术后的未来受孕情况。实施再次输精管复通手术的泌尿外科医生必须熟悉显微外科技术,因为近四分之三的患者至少需要单侧输精管附睾吻合术。