Suppr超能文献

病例组合指数的多大变化属于疾病诊断相关分组(DRG) creep?

How much change in the case mix index is DRG creep?

作者信息

Carter G M, Newhouse J P, Relles D A

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90406.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 1990;9(4):411-28. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90003-l.

Abstract

We re-abstracted a nationally representative sample of 7,887 Medicare charts to determine how much of the change in Medicare's Case Mix Index between 1986 and 1987 was true change in the complexity of cases and how much was upcoding or 'DRG creep'. About two-thirds of the change is true. Most of the remaining third is attributable to a general change in the completeness of coding; some is attributable to changes in the Grouper program. Thus, most of the additional $1 billion paid to hospitals because of the Case Mix Index change appears justified by the additional complexity of patients hospitalized.

摘要

我们重新提取了一个具有全国代表性的7887份医疗保险病历样本,以确定1986年至1987年医疗保险病例组合指数的变化中,有多少是病例复杂性的真实变化,又有多少是高编或“疾病诊断相关分组(DRG) creep”。大约三分之二的变化是真实的。其余三分之一的大部分可归因于编码完整性的普遍变化;一些可归因于分组器程序的变化。因此,由于病例组合指数变化而多支付给医院的10亿美元中,大部分似乎是由于住院患者额外的复杂性而合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验