Suppr超能文献

正式控制是否总能实现控制?以急诊科的分诊为例。

Do formal controls always achieve control? The case of triage in accident and emergency departments.

作者信息

Read S, Broadbent J, George S

机构信息

University of Sheffield Medical School.

出版信息

Health Serv Manage Res. 1994 Feb;7(1):31-42. doi: 10.1177/095148489400700104.

Abstract

Triage is the term used to describe the formal process of assigning urgency categories to patients arriving in a hospital accident and emergency department. This paper uses insights from literature on management control, medical sociology and nursing to illuminate the results of a research study comparing formal triage with an informal prioritisation process carried out by nurses. Topics discussed include whether triage is a bureaucratic process, whether it allows nurses' intuition to be expressed, whether it masks the urgency of the condition of the small number of seriously injured or ill patients, and whether responsibility for decisions on urgency should be separated from responsibility to act on those decisions. It is concluded that managers must consider these questions in the light of arrangements in their own hospital; departmental layout as well as the nursing staff's experience and commitment need to be taken into account.

摘要

分诊是用于描述为抵达医院急诊部的患者分配紧急程度类别的正式流程的术语。本文运用管理控制、医学社会学和护理学方面文献的见解,以阐明一项将正式分诊与护士进行的非正式优先排序过程相比较的研究结果。讨论的主题包括分诊是否是一个官僚化的过程、它是否允许护士表达直觉、它是否掩盖了少数重伤或重病患者病情的紧迫性,以及关于紧急程度的决策责任是否应与根据这些决策采取行动的责任分开。得出的结论是,管理人员必须根据自己医院的安排来考虑这些问题;需要考虑科室布局以及护理人员的经验和敬业精神。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验