Koo T K, Mak A F, Lee Y L
Jockey Club Rehabilitation Engineering Centre, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon.
Assist Technol. 1995;7(2):119-28. doi: 10.1080/10400435.1995.10132260.
In the first part of this study, the inflation-pressure and interface-pressure profiles of an active cushion system, the Talley active air bellows cushion, were examined continuously for one complete working cycle using the dynamic pressure monitor. The relationship between the inflation pressure and the interface pressure was explored. A well-defined relationship was found in the areas directly over the air bellows. In the second part of this study, the pressure-relieving characteristics of the active cushion were assessed quantitatively and compared to two types of passive cushions--the Roho high-profile air floatation cushion and the polyurethane (PU) foam cushion. Eight non-disabled subjects were positioned on the active cushion at two inflation-pressure levels--30 mmHg and 60 mmHg, or on the Roho or the PU foam cushions. Interface pressures were recorded using the Oxford pressure monitor. For the active cushion it was shown that the higher the inflation pressure was, the better the pressure-relieving characteristics seemed to be. In general, the pressure-relieving characteristics of the active cushion were not as good as those of the passive cushions being tested. The active cushion could alter the pressures over the ischial tuberosities cyclically but the amount of pressure alternation depended on the relative position of the ischial tuberosities and the air bellows.
在本研究的第一部分,使用动态压力监测仪对一种主动式坐垫系统——塔利主动气腹式坐垫的充气压力和界面压力分布进行了一个完整工作周期的连续检测。探讨了充气压力与界面压力之间的关系。在气腹正上方区域发现了明确的关系。在本研究的第二部分,对主动式坐垫的减压特性进行了定量评估,并与两种被动式坐垫——罗霍高轮廓空气漂浮坐垫和聚氨酯(PU)泡沫坐垫进行了比较。八名非残疾受试者分别以30 mmHg和60 mmHg两种充气压力水平置于主动式坐垫上,或以同样方式置于罗霍坐垫或PU泡沫坐垫上。使用牛津压力监测仪记录界面压力。结果表明,对于主动式坐垫,充气压力越高,减压特性似乎越好。总体而言,主动式坐垫的减压特性不如所测试的被动式坐垫。主动式坐垫可使坐骨结节上方的压力周期性变化,但压力变化量取决于坐骨结节与气腹的相对位置。