Keeler E B, Carter G, Newhouse J P
Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
J Health Econ. 1998 Jun;17(3):297-320. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00029-5.
Flat capitation (uniform prospective payments) makes enrolling healthy enrollees profitable to health plans. Plans with relatively generous benefits may attract the sick and fail through a premium spiral. We simulate a model of idealized managed competition to explore the effect on market performance of alternatives to flat capitation such as severity-adjusted capitation and reduced supply-side cost-sharing. In our model flat capitation causes severe market problems. Severity adjustment and to a lesser extent reduced supply-side cost-sharing improve market performance, but outcomes are efficient only in cases in which people bear the marginal costs of their choices.
定额付费(统一的预期支付)使得健康的参保人加入健康保险计划对保险公司来说有利可图。福利相对优厚的保险计划可能会吸引患病者,从而因保费螺旋式上升而失败。我们模拟了一个理想化的管理式竞争模型,以探究诸如病情调整定额付费和减少供方成本分担等定额付费替代方案对市场绩效的影响。在我们的模型中,定额付费会导致严重的市场问题。病情调整以及在较小程度上减少供方成本分担会改善市场绩效,但只有在人们承担其选择的边际成本的情况下,结果才是有效的。