Cruikshank S H, Kovac S R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Apr;180(4):859-65. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70656-3.
This study compared 3 surgical methods of prophylaxis against enterocele formation employed at the time of vaginal hysterectomy.
One hundred consecutive women undergoing total vaginal hysterectomy for various reasons were randomly assigned to have 1 of 3 surgical methods applied to the posterior superior aspect of the vagina for prophylaxis against enterocele formation. The first procedure involved closing the cul-de-sac and bringing the uterosacral-cardinal complex together in the midline in a vaginal Moschcowitz-type operation. The second procedure was a McCall-type culdeplasty to obliterate the cul-de-sac, plicate the uterosacral-cardinal complex, and elevate any redundant posterior vaginal apex. The third technique used only the peritoneum to close the cul-de-sac, allowing passive movement of the uterosacral-cardinal complex to the midline, no obliteration per se, and no elevation of the posterior vagina. Postoperative findings on pelvic examination were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1, 2, and 3 years. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi2 test of independence.
At 6 weeks' follow-up and at 3 months' follow-up there were no prolapses involving the posterior superior segment of the vagina. At 1 year of follow-up 11 patients had stage 1 or 2 posterior superior segment prolapse. At 2 years' follow-up this number was 16. At 3 years' follow-up the McCall-type method was statistically better (chi2 = 11.27 with 2 degrees of freedom, P =. 004) than the other 2 in preventing postoperative enterocele (n = 2 of 32 with McCall-type procedure, n = 10 of 33 with vaginal Moschcowitz-type procedure, and n = 13 of 33 with peritoneal closure only).
When applied at the time of vaginal hysterectomy the McCall-type culdeplasty is superior to a vaginal Moschcowitz-type procedure and to simple peritoneal closure in preventing subsequent enterocele.
本研究比较了阴道子宫切除术中预防肠膨出形成的3种手术方法。
100名因各种原因接受全阴道子宫切除术的连续女性被随机分配,对阴道后上侧采用3种手术方法中的1种来预防肠膨出形成。第一种手术是在阴道Moschcowitz式手术中封闭直肠陷凹并将子宫骶骨-主韧带复合体在中线处并拢。第二种手术是McCall式直肠成形术,以闭塞直肠陷凹,折叠子宫骶骨-主韧带复合体,并提升任何多余的阴道后穹窿。第三种技术仅使用腹膜封闭直肠陷凹,使子宫骶骨-主韧带复合体被动移至中线,不进行闭塞本身操作,也不提升阴道后壁。在术后6周、3个月以及1、2和3年时评估盆腔检查的术后结果。采用独立性χ²检验进行统计分析。
在6周和3个月的随访中,未出现涉及阴道后上节段的脱垂。在1年随访时,11名患者出现1期或2期阴道后上节段脱垂。在2年随访时,这一数字为16。在3年随访时,McCall式方法在预防术后肠膨出方面在统计学上优于其他两种方法(自由度为2时χ² = 11.27,P = 0.004)(McCall式手术32例中有2例,阴道Moschcowitz式手术33例中有10例,仅腹膜封闭33例中有13例)。
在阴道子宫切除术中应用时,McCall式直肠成形术在预防后续肠膨出方面优于阴道Moschcowitz式手术和单纯腹膜封闭。