Tagawa Y, Yuki N, Hirata K
Department of Neurology, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.
Ther Apher. 1997 Nov;1(4):336-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.1997.tb00050.x.
The value of plasma exchange (PE) in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is well established. In Japan, patients with GBS and related diseases often receive double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) as well as PE. No comparative trials between PE and DFPP, however, have been conducted. We compared their abilities to remove immunoglobulins and antiganglioside antibodies to find out whether DFPP is equivalent to PE. The ability to remove immunoglobulins and antiganglioside antibodies was compared between PE and DFPP using plasma samples from 41 patients with GBS and related diseases before and after each treatment session. The ability of DFPP to remove both IgGs and antiganglioside IgG antibodies were significantly inferior to those of PE. There is a less theoretical basis for selecting DFPP as the first choice of plasmapheresis for GBS and related disorders.
血浆置换(PE)在吉兰 - 巴雷综合征(GBS)中的价值已得到充分证实。在日本,患有GBS及相关疾病的患者经常接受双重滤过血浆置换(DFPP)以及PE。然而,尚未进行PE与DFPP之间的对比试验。我们比较了它们清除免疫球蛋白和抗神经节苷脂抗体的能力,以确定DFPP是否等同于PE。使用41例GBS及相关疾病患者每次治疗前后的血浆样本,比较了PE和DFPP清除免疫球蛋白和抗神经节苷脂抗体的能力。DFPP清除IgG和抗神经节苷脂IgG抗体的能力明显低于PE。选择DFPP作为GBS及相关疾病血浆置换的首选方法,理论依据较少。