Suppr超能文献

植入前基因诊断与“新”优生学。

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.

作者信息

King D S

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1999 Apr;25(2):176-82. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.2.176.

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PID) is often seen as an improvement upon prenatal testing. I argue that PID may exacerbate the eugenic features of prenatal testing and make possible an expanded form of free-market eugenics. The current practice of prenatal testing is eugenic in that its aim is to reduce the numbers of people with genetic disorders. Due to social pressures and eugenic attitudes held by clinical geneticists in most countries, it results in eugenic outcomes even though no state coercion is involved. I argue that technological advances may soon make PID widely accessible. Because abortion is not involved, and multiple embryos are available, PID is radically more effective as a tool of genetic selection. It will also make possible selection on the basis of non-pathological characteristics, leading, potentially, to a full-blown free-market eugenics. For these reasons, I argue that PID should be strictly regulated.

摘要

植入前基因诊断(PID)通常被视为产前检测的一种改进。我认为,PID可能会加剧产前检测的优生特征,并使一种扩展形式的自由市场优生学成为可能。当前的产前检测实践具有优生性质,因为其目的是减少患有遗传疾病的人数。由于大多数国家临床遗传学家所面临的社会压力和优生态度,即使没有国家强制力介入,它也会导致优生结果。我认为技术进步可能很快会使PID广泛可用。由于不涉及堕胎,并且有多个胚胎可供选择,PID作为一种基因选择工具从根本上来说更有效。它还将使基于非病理特征的选择成为可能,这可能会导致全面的自由市场优生学。出于这些原因,我认为应该对PID进行严格监管。

相似文献

1
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.
J Med Ethics. 1999 Apr;25(2):176-82. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.2.176.
2
Reprogenetics policy: three kinds of models.
Community Genet. 1998;1(2):61-70. doi: 10.1159/000016139.
3
Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality.
Disabil Soc. 1998 Nov;13(5):665-81. doi: 10.1080/09687599826452.
5
Genetic selection of offspring characteristics.
Boston Univ Law Rev. 1996 Jun;76(3):421-82.
6
China's eugenics law: position statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
J Med Genet. 1997 Nov;34(11):960. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.11.960.
7
Reproductive genetics: Canadian and European perspectives.
Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993 Apr;8(Suppl. 1):189-201. doi: 10.1159/000263887.
8
Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions.
Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993 Apr;8(Suppl. 1):148-59. doi: 10.1159/000263882.
9
Eugenics and genetic testing.
Sci Context. 1998 Autumn-Winter;11(3-4):397-417. doi: 10.1017/s0269889700003100.
10
Toward an ethical eugenics: the case for mandatory preimplantation genetic selection.
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2012 Jan-Mar;14(1):7-13. doi: 10.1097/NHL.0b013e318244c69b.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ethics of Human Embryo Editing via CRISPR-Cas9 Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Arguments, Reasons, and Concerns.
HEC Forum. 2025 Jun;37(2):267-303. doi: 10.1007/s10730-024-09538-1. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Everything in moderation, even hype: learning from vaccine controversies to strike a balance with CRISPR.
J Med Ethics. 2017 Dec;43(12):819-823. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103666. Epub 2017 May 4.
4
Public Perceptions of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Dec;23(6):1563-1580. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9857-z. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
Religious Scholars' Attitudes and Views on Ethical Issues Pertaining to Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Sep;13(3):419-29. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9724-2. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
6
Prenatal screening, reproductive choice, and public health.
Bioethics. 2015 Jan;29(1):26-35. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12121.
7
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does age of onset matter (anymore)?
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Jun;12(2):187-202. doi: 10.1007/s11019-008-9171-x. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
8
"Eugenics talk" and the language of bioethics.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jun;34(6):467-71. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021592.
9
Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people.
J Med Ethics. 2005 Apr;31(4):231-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.006429.
10
Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
J Mol Diagn. 2002 Feb;4(1):11-29. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60676-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Preimplantation diagnosis: points to consider.
Biomed Ethics. 1998;3(2):52-60.
2
Cloning, dignity and ethical revisionism.
Nature. 1997 Jul 24;388(6640):320. doi: 10.1038/40960.
4
DNA chips: analysing sequence by hybridization to oligonucleotides on a large scale.
Trends Genet. 1996 Mar;12(3):110-5. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)81422-3.
5
Low temperature storage and grafting of human ovarian tissue.
Hum Reprod. 1996 Jul;11(7):1487-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019423.
7
Obstetricians' views on prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: 1980 compared with 1993.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Mar;102(3):228-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09099.x.
8
Attributions for disability: the influence of genetic screening.
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(8):1127-32. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00180-2.
9
Commentary: Preimplantation diagnosis raises a philosophical dilemma.
BMJ. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):540. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.540.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验