Henson R N, Rugg M D, Shallice T, Josephs O, Dolan R J
Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 1999 May 15;19(10):3962-72. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-10-03962.1999.
The question of whether recognition memory judgments with and without recollection reflect dissociable patterns of brain activity is unresolved. We used event-related, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of 12 healthy volunteers to measure hemodynamic responses associated with both studying and recognizing words. Volunteers made one of three judgments to each word during recognition: whether they recollected seeing it during study (R judgments), whether they experienced a feeling of familiarity in the absence of recollection (K judgments), or whether they did not remember seeing it during study (N judgments). Both R and K judgments for studied words were associated with enhanced responses in left prefrontal and left parietal cortices relative to N judgments for unstudied words. The opposite pattern was observed in bilateral temporoccipital regions and amygdalae. R judgments for studied words were associated with enhanced responses in anterior left prefrontal, left parietal, and posterior cingulate regions relative to K judgments. At study, a posterior left prefrontal region exhibited an enhanced response to words subsequently given R versus K judgments, but the response of this region during recognition did not differentiate R and K judgments. K judgments for studied words were associated with enhanced responses in right lateral and medial prefrontal cortex relative to both R judgments for studied words and N judgments for unstudied words, a difference we attribute to greater monitoring demands when memory judgments are less certain. These results suggest that the responses of different brain regions do dissociate according to the phenomenology associated with memory retrieval.
有无回忆的识别记忆判断是否反映了可分离的大脑活动模式这一问题尚未得到解决。我们对12名健康志愿者进行了与事件相关的功能磁共振成像(fMRI),以测量与单词学习和识别相关的血液动力学反应。在识别过程中,志愿者对每个单词做出三种判断之一:他们是否回忆起在学习过程中见过这个单词(R判断),他们在没有回忆的情况下是否有熟悉感(K判断),或者他们是否不记得在学习过程中见过这个单词(N判断)。相对于对未学习单词的N判断,对学习过的单词的R和K判断都与左前额叶和左顶叶皮质的反应增强有关。在双侧颞枕叶区域和杏仁核中观察到相反的模式。相对于K判断,对学习过的单词的R判断与左前额叶前部、左顶叶和后扣带回区域的反应增强有关。在学习时,左前额叶后部区域对随后给予R判断而非K判断的单词表现出增强的反应,但该区域在识别过程中的反应并未区分R和K判断。相对于对学习过的单词的R判断和对未学习单词的N判断,对学习过的单词的K判断与右侧外侧和内侧前额叶皮质的反应增强有关,我们将这种差异归因于当记忆判断不太确定时更大的监测需求。这些结果表明,不同脑区的反应确实根据与记忆检索相关的现象学而分离。