Marshall M N
Institute of General Practice, Postgraduate Medical School, University of Exeter, UK.
Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):33-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.1.33.
The professional relationship between GPs and hospital consultants (sometimes referred to as 'specialists') is important in a healthcare system based upon the generalist as the first point of contact for patients and the gate-keeper for hospital services. This relationship has been the subject of considerable interest over the years, but little empirical research.
We aimed to compare the attitudes of GPs and specialists to key issues, and to produce a validated objective measure of their ability to work together.
We conducted a Likert-style survey based upon statements made in qualitative interviews with GPs and specialists working in the South and West of England. The questionnaire was modified and validated during a multi-stage pilot and was distributed to a stratified random sample of 800 clinicians.
GPs and specialists demonstrate a good level of agreement, mutual understanding and respect, though there are significant differences between the two branches of the profession in terms of attitude towards financial parity and direct access to special investigations.
A measure of the ability of GPs and specialists to work together has been developed, with acceptable internal consistency and validity. It may be used in other geographical areas to assess a relationship which is central to the efficient and effective operation of the National Health Service.
在以全科医生作为患者首诊点和医院服务守门人的医疗体系中,全科医生与医院顾问医生(有时被称为“专科医生”)之间的专业关系至关重要。多年来,这种关系一直备受关注,但实证研究却很少。
我们旨在比较全科医生和专科医生对关键问题的态度,并制定一种经过验证的客观方法来衡量他们的合作能力。
我们基于对英格兰南部和西部的全科医生和专科医生进行的定性访谈中所提出的陈述,开展了一项李克特式调查。该问卷在多阶段试点过程中进行了修改和验证,并分发给了800名临床医生的分层随机样本。
全科医生和专科医生表现出了较高程度的共识、相互理解和尊重,尽管在对财务平等和直接进行特殊检查的态度方面,这两个专业分支之间存在显著差异。
已开发出一种衡量全科医生和专科医生合作能力的方法,其内部一致性和有效性可接受。它可用于其他地区,以评估对国家医疗服务体系高效运作至关重要的一种关系。