Banasiak D, Barnetson A R, Odell R A, Mameghan H, Russell P J
Oncology Research Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Radiat Oncol Investig. 1999;7(2):77-85. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6823(1999)7:2<77::AID-ROI3>3.0.CO;2-M.
Using a series of human bladder cancer cell lines and an immortalised normal ureteral cell line, radiosensitivities measured by three different methods after a single dose of X-radiation are compared. Clear differences between cell survival curves obtained using the clonogenic, microtetrazoline (MTT) and sulforhodamine B (SRB) assays are shown. The most sensitive of the assays investigated was the clonogenic assay. The MTT and SRB assays were found to be relatively insensitive especially at lower radiation levels, suggesting that these assays may not be suitable for predicting therapeutic dose schedules in vivo, but will be important for investigating radio-sensitivity in cell lines with very low plating efficiencies. Each assay discriminated between a range of sensitivities in the cell lines examined, and with some minor differences, the ordering of sensitivities using the three assays was similar. Possible explanations for the differences between results obtained with the three assays are discussed.
使用一系列人膀胱癌细胞系和一种永生化正常输尿管细胞系,比较单次X射线辐射后通过三种不同方法测量的放射敏感性。结果显示,使用克隆形成法、微量四氮唑蓝(MTT)法和磺酰罗丹明B(SRB)法获得的细胞存活曲线存在明显差异。所研究的检测方法中最敏感的是克隆形成法。发现MTT法和SRB法相对不敏感,尤其是在较低辐射水平下,这表明这些检测方法可能不适用于预测体内治疗剂量方案,但对于研究接种效率非常低的细胞系的放射敏感性很重要。每种检测方法都能区分所检测细胞系中的一系列敏感性,并且在一些细微差异的情况下,使用这三种检测方法得出的敏感性排序相似。讨论了三种检测方法结果差异的可能解释。