Falk S, Oulianova N, Berteloot A
Membrane Transport Research Group, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada.
Biophys J. 1999 Jul;77(1):173-88. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)76880-3.
Although phlorizin inhibition of Na+-glucose cotransport occurs within a few seconds, 3H-phlorizin binding to the sodium-coupled glucose transport protein(s) requires several minutes to reach equilibrium (the fast-acting slow-binding paradigm). Using kinetic models of arbitrary dimension that can be reduced to a two-state diagram according to Cha's formalism, we show that three basic mechanisms of inhibitor binding can be identified whereby the inhibitor binding step either (A) represents, (B) precedes, or (C) follows the rate-limiting step in a binding reaction. We demonstrate that each of mechanisms A-C is associated with a set of unique kinetic properties, and that the time scale over which one may expect to observe mechanism C is conditioned by the turnover number of the catalytic cycle. In contrast, mechanisms A and B may be relevant to either fast-acting or slow-binding inhibitors. However, slow-binding inhibition according to mechanism A may not be compatible with a fast-acting behavior on the steady-state time scale of a few seconds. We conclude that the recruitment hypothesis (mechanism C) cannot account for slow phlorizin binding to the sodium-coupled glucose transport protein(s), and that mechanism B is the only alternative that may explain the fast-acting slow-binding paradigm.
尽管根皮苷对钠-葡萄糖共转运的抑制作用在几秒钟内即可发生,但3H-根皮苷与钠偶联葡萄糖转运蛋白的结合需要几分钟才能达到平衡(快速起效的慢结合模式)。使用根据查氏形式主义可简化为双态图的任意维度动力学模型,我们表明可以识别出抑制剂结合的三种基本机制,其中抑制剂结合步骤要么(A)代表、(B)先于、要么(C)跟随结合反应中的限速步骤。我们证明机制A-C中的每一种都与一组独特的动力学特性相关,并且预期观察到机制C的时间尺度受催化循环周转数的制约。相比之下,机制A和B可能与快速起效或慢结合抑制剂都相关。然而,根据机制A的慢结合抑制在几秒钟的稳态时间尺度上可能与快速起效行为不兼容。我们得出结论,募集假说(机制C)无法解释根皮苷与钠偶联葡萄糖转运蛋白的慢结合,并且机制B是唯一可能解释快速起效的慢结合模式的替代方案。