Suppr超能文献

谁将挑战循证医学?

Who will challenge evidence-based medicine?

作者信息

Goodman N W

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Southmead Hospital, Bristol.

出版信息

J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1999 May-Jun;33(3):249-51.

Abstract

Evidence based medicine (EBM), which lays special emphasis on the formal gathering and synthesis of research data by systematic review and meta-analysis, is intuitively attractive as a way of determining best treatments. However, questions remain unanswered about the underlying assumptions of EBM. There is little true dialogue between its critics and its advocates, although the latter have had considerable disagreements among themselves in the correspondence columns of medical journals about the precise way in which its methods should be used. EBM medicine is in danger of becoming a new and unchallengeable orthodoxy following its own political agenda.

摘要

循证医学(EBM)特别强调通过系统评价和荟萃分析对研究数据进行正式收集和综合,作为确定最佳治疗方法的一种方式,从直观上看很有吸引力。然而,循证医学的潜在假设仍存在一些未得到解答的问题。尽管循证医学的倡导者们在医学期刊的通信专栏中就其方法的具体使用方式存在相当大的分歧,但批评者和倡导者之间几乎没有真正的对话。循证医学正面临着遵循自身政治议程而成为一种新的、不可挑战的正统观念的危险。

相似文献

1
Who will challenge evidence-based medicine?
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1999 May-Jun;33(3):249-51.
2
Evidence-based medicine for neurosurgeons: introduction and methodology.
Prog Neurol Surg. 2006;19:1-53. doi: 10.1159/000095175.
3
[Meta-analysis and evidence based medicine].
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2002 Oct;29(10):1705-10.
4
Evidence-based medicine: opportunities and challenges in a diverse society.
Can J Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;56(9):514-22. doi: 10.1177/070674371105600902.
5
Evidence-based medicine: what is the evidence that it has made a difference?
Palliat Med. 2011 Jul;25(5):394-7. doi: 10.1177/0269216310394707.
6
[Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jul;45(7-8):510-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262480. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
7
Evidence-based medicine: arguments for and against.
Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Aug;17(4):307-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00753.x.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
The pitfalls of narrative reviews in clinical medicine.
Ann Oncol. 1998 Jun;9(6):601-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1008299304900.

引用本文的文献

1
Homeopathy, fundamentalism, and the memory of water.
Curr Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(6):221-2; author reply 222-3. doi: 10.3747/co.2007.161.
2
Tricyclic antidepressant pharmacology and therapeutic drug interactions updated.
Br J Pharmacol. 2007 Jul;151(6):737-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707253. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
3
A philosophical analysis of the evidence-based medicine debate.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2003 Jul 21;3(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-3-14.
4
Intuition and evidence--uneasy bedfellows?
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 May;52(478):395-400.
5
Questioning in general practice--a tool for change.
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Sep;50(458):747-50.
6
Therapeutic trials in childhood ALL: what's their future?
J Clin Pathol. 2000 Jan;53(1):55-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.1.55.
7
Evidence based medicine.
Arch Dis Child. 2000 Apr;82(4):275-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.82.4.275.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验