Gaertner E, Kern O, Mahoudeau G, Freys G, Golfetto T, Calon B
Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Hôpital de Hautepierre, France.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Jul;43(6):609-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430603.x.
Brachial plexus is usually approached by the supraclavicular or axillary route. A technique for selective blockade of the branches of the plexus at the humeral canal using electrolocation has recently been proposed. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of this technique in the ambulatory patient and to determine the optimal sequence of nerve-blocking.
The nerves originating from the brachial plexus were located in the humeral canal, at the junction of the proximal and the middle third of the arm, with a stimulator and blocked using either lidocaine or a mixture of lidocaine and bupivacaine, depending on the anticipated duration of surgery. The minimal stimulating intensity eliciting an adequate response, type of local anaesthetic and injected volume, and time of onset of surgical anaesthesia were collected.
The study included 503 consecutive ambulatory patients due to undergo surgery of the elbow, wrist or hand in one year. Suitable anaesthesia was obtained with the humeral blockade in 82.1% of cases. In the remaining 17.9%, an additional block at the elbow was required, mainly for ulnar and median nerves. The onset times of sensory blocks were the longest for the median nerve, similar for the radial and ulnar nerves, shorter for the musculocutaneous nerve and the shortest for the medial brachial and antebrachial cutaneous nerves. The difference was more significant with the lidocaine-bupivacaine mixture, than with lidocaine alone (P<0.001 vs P<0.05, respectively). The onset times of motor blocks were the longest for the median nerve (P<0.05) and the shortest for the musculocutaneous nerve (P<0.001). Neither nervous nor vascular complications occurred.
This study shows that the nerve block at the humeral canal is an efficient and safe technique. Considering the onset times of nerve blocks, the following sequence for blockade can be recommended: median, ulnar, radial, musculocutaneous, medial (brachial and antebrachial) cutaneous nerves. The selective blockade of the main nerves of the upper limb at the humeral canal can be recommended for surgery of the forearm and the hand in the ambulatory patient.
臂丛神经阻滞通常采用锁骨上或腋路。最近有人提出一种利用电定位技术在肱骨管处选择性阻滞臂丛神经分支的方法。本研究的目的是评估该技术在门诊患者中的可行性,并确定神经阻滞的最佳顺序。
使用刺激器在肱骨管(位于手臂近端和中部三分之一交界处)定位源自臂丛神经的神经,根据预期手术时长,用利多卡因或利多卡因与布比卡因的混合液进行阻滞。记录引发足够反应的最小刺激强度、局部麻醉药类型及注射量,以及手术麻醉起效时间。
本研究纳入了连续503例计划在一年内接受肘部、腕部或手部手术的门诊患者。82.1%的病例通过肱骨阻滞获得了合适的麻醉效果。其余17.9%的患者需要在肘部额外阻滞,主要是尺神经和正中神经。感觉阻滞起效时间以正中神经最长,桡神经和尺神经相似,肌皮神经较短,臂内侧和前臂内侧皮神经最短。利多卡因与布比卡因混合液的差异比单独使用利多卡因更显著(分别为P<0.001和P<0.05)。运动阻滞起效时间以正中神经最长(P<0.05),肌皮神经最短(P<0.001)。未发生神经或血管并发症。
本研究表明,肱骨管神经阻滞是一种有效且安全的技术。考虑到神经阻滞的起效时间,可推荐以下阻滞顺序:正中神经、尺神经、桡神经、肌皮神经、臂内侧(和前臂内侧)皮神经。对于门诊患者的前臂和手部手术,可推荐在肱骨管处选择性阻滞上肢主要神经。