Grampp S, Henk C B, Fuerst T P, Lu Y, Bader T R, Kainberger F, Genant H K, Imhof H
Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik, Ostelogie/MR, Vienna, Austria.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Aug;173(2):329-34. doi: 10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430129.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic agreement between quantitative sonography of the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the spine and femur for revealing osteoporosis.
In 1252 patients (795 women, 54.9+/-15 years old; 457 men, 50.5+/-15 years old [mean+/-SD]), bone mineral density measurements of the lumbar spine (posteroanterior, L1-L4) and the proximal femur (neck, trochanter, intertrochanteric region, total proximal femur, and Ward's triangle) and quantitative sonographic measurements of the stiffness of the calcaneus were performed. The presence of osteoporosis is defined, according to the World Health Organization criteria, as a T-score lower than -2.5. The percentage of patients below the threshold (prevalence of osteoporosis) was calculated for each imaging technique. The diagnostic agreement in identifying individuals as osteoporotic was assessed using kappa scores.
Forty-nine percent of the women and 42% of the men were classified as osteoporotic by quantitative sonography, 32% of women and 30% of men by DXA of the spine, and 23-54% of women and 16-54% of men by the different regions of interest revealed on femoral DXA. Kappa analysis showed the diagnostic agreement among these measures to be generally poor (kappa = .28-.41 [women] and .25-.45 [men]).
The considerable diagnostic disagreement between quantitative sonography and DXA could cause confusion in the daily practice of radiology and make establishing the correct diagnosis a difficult task. The choice of imaging technique influences which patients are diagnosed as osteoporotic.
我们研究的目的是评估跟骨定量超声检查与脊柱和股骨双能X线吸收法(DXA)在诊断骨质疏松症方面的一致性。
对1252例患者(795名女性,平均年龄54.9±15岁;457名男性,平均年龄50.5±15岁[均值±标准差])进行了腰椎(前后位,L1-L4)和股骨近端(颈部、大转子、转子间区域、股骨近端整体及沃德三角区)的骨密度测量以及跟骨硬度的定量超声测量。根据世界卫生组织标准,骨质疏松症的定义为T值低于-2.5。计算每种成像技术下低于该阈值的患者百分比(骨质疏松症患病率)。使用kappa评分评估在识别骨质疏松症个体方面的诊断一致性。
通过定量超声检查,49%的女性和42%的男性被归类为骨质疏松症患者;通过脊柱DXA检查,32%的女性和30%的男性被归类为骨质疏松症患者;通过股骨DXA检查所显示的不同感兴趣区域,23%-54%的女性和16%-54%的男性被归类为骨质疏松症患者。Kappa分析表明,这些测量方法之间的诊断一致性总体较差(女性kappa = 0.28 - 0.41,男性kappa = 0.25 - 0.45)。
定量超声检查与DXA之间存在显著的诊断差异,这可能会在放射科日常工作中造成混淆,使做出正确诊断成为一项艰巨任务。成像技术的选择会影响哪些患者被诊断为骨质疏松症。