Suppr超能文献

儿科骨密度参考数据的差异:骨质减少误诊的可能性。

Discrepancies in pediatric bone mineral density reference data: potential for misdiagnosis of osteopenia.

作者信息

Leonard M B, Propert K J, Zemel B S, Stallings V A, Feldman H I

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1999 Aug;135(2 Pt 1):182-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70020-x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate published pediatric dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density (BMD) reference data by comparing the diagnostic classification of measured BMD in children at risk for osteopenia as healthy or osteopenic according to reference source.

STUDY DESIGN

Spine BMD was measured in 95 children, ages 9 to 15 years, at risk for osteopenia because of childhood disease. The BMD results were converted to age-specific z scores for each of the 5 reference data sets, and the z -score distributions were compared.

RESULTS

Between 11% and 30% of children were classified as osteopenic (z score < -2.0) depending on the reference data set. The 2 sex-specific reference data sets yielded similar diagnostic classification of boys and girls: 10% of boys and 11% to 16% of girls were osteopenic (P =.4). The 3 sex-nonspecific reference data sets classified 9% to 13% of girls and 24% to 44% of boys as osteopenic; the diagnosis of osteopenia was significantly greater in boys (P <.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of different published reference data for the assessment of children at risk for osteopenia results in inconsistent diagnostic classification of BMD results. These inconsistencies can be partially attributed to sex-nonspecific reference data that result in misclassification of boys as osteopenic.

摘要

目的

通过比较根据参考来源将骨质减少风险儿童的测量骨密度诊断分类为健康或骨质减少,来评估已发表的儿科双能X线吸收法骨密度(BMD)参考数据。

研究设计

对95名9至15岁因儿童疾病而有骨质减少风险的儿童进行脊柱骨密度测量。将骨密度结果转换为5个参考数据集中每个数据集的年龄特异性z评分,并比较z评分分布。

结果

根据参考数据集,11%至30%的儿童被分类为骨质减少(z评分<-2.0)。两个性别特异性参考数据集对男孩和女孩的诊断分类相似:10%的男孩和11%至16%的女孩为骨质减少(P = 0.4)。三个非性别特异性参考数据集将9%至13%的女孩和24%至44%的男孩分类为骨质减少;男孩骨质减少的诊断明显更多(P<0.01)。

结论

使用不同的已发表参考数据评估骨质减少风险儿童会导致骨密度结果的诊断分类不一致。这些不一致部分可归因于非性别特异性参考数据导致男孩被误分类为骨质减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验