Timmins G S, Liu K J, Bechara E J, Kotake Y, Swartz H M
EPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
Free Radic Biol Med. 1999 Aug;27(3-4):329-33. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00049-0.
To spin trap hydroxyl radical (HO*) with in vivo detection of the resultant radical adducts, the use of two spin traps, 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) and 5-diethoxyphosphoryl-5-methyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DEPMPO) (10 mmol/kg) has been compared. In mice treatment with 5-aminolevulinic acid and Fe3+ resulted in detection of adducts of hydroxyl radicals (HO*), but only with use of DEPMPO. Similarly, 'HO* adducts' generated via nucleophilic substitution of SO4*- adducts formed in vivo could be observed only when using DEPMPO as the spin trap. The reasons for the differences observed between DEPMPO and DMPO are likely due to different in vivo lifetimes of their hydroxyl radical adducts. These results seem to be the first direct in vivo EPR detection of hydroxyl radical adducts.
为了通过体内检测所得自由基加合物来自旋捕获羟基自由基(HO*),已对两种自旋捕获剂5,5-二甲基-1-吡咯啉-N-氧化物(DMPO)和5-二乙氧基磷酰基-5-甲基-1-吡咯啉-N-氧化物(DEPMPO)(10 mmol/kg)的使用进行了比较。在用5-氨基乙酰丙酸和Fe3+处理的小鼠中,仅使用DEPMPO时才能检测到羟基自由基(HO*)的加合物。同样,只有当使用DEPMPO作为自旋捕获剂时,才能观察到通过体内形成的SO4*-加合物的亲核取代产生的“HO*加合物”。在DEPMPO和DMPO之间观察到差异的原因可能是由于它们的羟基自由基加合物在体内的寿命不同。这些结果似乎是首次在体内直接通过电子顺磁共振检测羟基自由基加合物。