Sentürker S, Dizdaroglu M
Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8311, USA.
Free Radic Biol Med. 1999 Aug;27(3-4):370-80. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00069-6.
Recently, an artifactual formation of a number of modified DNA bases has been alleged during derivatization of DNA hydrolysates to be analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). These modified bases were 8-hydroxyguanine (8-OH-Gua), 5-hydroxycytosine (5-OH-Cyt), 8-hydroxyadenine (8-OH-Ade), 5-hydroxymethyluracil (5-OHMeUra), and 5-formyluracil, which represent only a small percentage of more than 20 modified DNA bases that can be analyzed by GC-MS. However, relevant papers reporting the levels of these modified bases in DNA of various sources have not been cited, and differences in experimental procedures have not been discussed. We investigated the levels of modified bases in calf thymus DNA by GC-MS using derivatization at three different temperatures. The results obtained with GC/isotope-dilution MS showed that the levels of 5-OH-Cyt, 8-OH-Ade, 5-OH-Ura, and 5-OHMeUra were not affected by increasing the derivatization temperature from 23 degrees C to 120 degrees C. The level of 8-OH-Gua was found to be higher at 120 degrees C. However, this level was much lower than those reported previously. Formamidopyrimidines were readily analyzed in contrast to some recent claims. The addition of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) adversely affected the levels of pyrimidine-derived lesions, suggesting that TFA is not suitable for simultaneous measurement of both pyrimidine- and purine-derived lesions. The data obtained were also compared with those previously published. Our data and this comparison indicate that no artifactual formation of 5-OH-Cyt, 8-OH-Ade, and 5-OHMeUra occurred under our experimental conditions in contrast to recent claims, and no prepurification of DNA hydrolysates by a tedious procedure is necessary for accurate quantification of these compounds. The artifactual formation of 8-OH-Gua can be eliminated by derivatization at room temperature for at least 2 h, without the use of TFA. The results in this article and their comparison with published data indicate that different results may be obtained in different laboratories using different experimental conditions. The data obtained in various laboratories should be compared by discussing all relevant published data and scientific facts, including differences between experimental conditions used in different laboratories.
最近,有人宣称在将DNA水解产物衍生化以通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)进行分析的过程中,会人为形成一些修饰的DNA碱基。这些修饰碱基包括8-羟基鸟嘌呤(8-OH-Gua)、5-羟基胞嘧啶(5-OH-Cyt)、8-羟基腺嘌呤(8-OH-Ade)、5-羟甲基尿嘧啶(5-OHMeUra)和5-甲酰基尿嘧啶,在可通过GC-MS分析的20多种修饰DNA碱基中,它们仅占一小部分。然而,尚未引用报道不同来源DNA中这些修饰碱基水平的相关论文,也未讨论实验程序的差异。我们使用三种不同温度的衍生化方法,通过GC-MS研究了小牛胸腺DNA中修饰碱基的水平。GC/同位素稀释质谱法得到的结果表明,将衍生化温度从23℃提高到120℃,5-OH-Cyt、8-OH-Ade、5-OH-Ura和5-OHMeUra的水平不受影响。发现8-OH-Gua在120℃时水平较高。然而,该水平远低于先前报道的水平。与最近的一些说法相反,甲酰胺嘧啶很容易被分析。添加三氟乙酸(TFA)对嘧啶衍生损伤的水平有不利影响,这表明TFA不适用于同时测量嘧啶和嘌呤衍生的损伤。还将获得的数据与先前发表的数据进行了比较。我们的数据以及这种比较表明,与最近的说法相反,在我们的实验条件下,未发生5-OH-Cyt、8-OH-Ade和5-OHMeUra的人为形成,并且对于准确定量这些化合物,无需通过繁琐的程序对DNA水解产物进行预纯化。通过在室温下衍生化至少2小时且不使用TFA,可以消除8-OH-Gua的人为形成。本文的结果及其与已发表数据的比较表明,在不同实验室使用不同实验条件可能会得到不同结果。应通过讨论所有相关的已发表数据和科学事实,包括不同实验室使用的实验条件之间的差异,来比较各个实验室获得的数据。