Bell C, Luther M A, Nicholson J J, Fox C J, Hirsh J L
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8051, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 1999 Jun;11(4):323-7. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(99)00053-7.
To determine if the traditional band-wrap disposable pulse oximeter probe is more accurate or reliable for oxygen monitoring in children than the reusable clip-type probe.
Prospective, observational clinical study.
Operating room of a large university hospital.
18 children 11 years of age or younger, who were scheduled for general anesthesia with placement of an intraarterial catheter.
Pulse oximetry values were obtained using both band and clip probes of three pulse oximeters (Nellcor, Hayward CA; Novametrix, Wallingford, CT; Ohmeda, Boulder, CO) and compared with simultaneous hemoximetry values. Dropout rate (percent of down time) also was recorded for each probe-machine combination.
Data were analyzed using bias and precision and t-test. p < 0.05 is considered significant. Bias (mean SpO2-SaO2) is less than 2% for all probe-machine combinations. The range of error observed between SpO2 and SaO2 for all data points was greatest using the Nellcor band (27.8%) and least using the Ohmeda band (11.4%). In cyanotic children, the greatest bias and precision were observed with Nellcor band (N = 11, -5.12 +/- 9.74) and the best agreement with Novametrix band (N = 17, 0.08 +/- 4.21). The difference in bias for any test units above or below the median weight of 13.75 kg did not vary by more than 1%. Dropout rate was minimal for all units in nonbypass situations. After cardiopulmonary bypass, no data dropout was observed with Ohmeda band; observed down time with the other units varied between 34% and 55%.
The type of probe selected has little effect on accuracy of pulse oximetry in children. After cardiopulmonary bypass, using the Ohmeda band combination may improve the likelihood of obtaining consistent readings and decreasing down time.
确定传统的绷带式一次性脉搏血氧饱和度探头在儿童氧监测方面是否比可重复使用的夹子式探头更准确或可靠。
前瞻性观察性临床研究。
一所大型大学医院的手术室。
18名11岁及以下计划接受全身麻醉并放置动脉内导管的儿童。
使用三种脉搏血氧仪(Nellcor,加利福尼亚州海沃德市;Novametrix,康涅狄格州沃灵福德市;Ohmeda,科罗拉多州博尔德市)的绷带式和夹子式探头获取脉搏血氧饱和度值,并与同时进行的血液血氧饱和度测定值进行比较。还记录了每种探头 - 仪器组合的失效率(停机时间百分比)。
使用偏差、精密度和t检验分析数据。p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。所有探头 - 仪器组合的偏差(平均SpO2 - SaO2)均小于2%。所有数据点中,使用Nellcor绷带时观察到的SpO2和SaO2之间的误差范围最大(27.8%),使用Ohmeda绷带时最小(11.4%)。在发绀儿童中,使用Nellcor绷带时观察到最大的偏差和精密度(N = 11,-5.12 +/- 9.74),与Novametrix绷带的一致性最好(N = 17,0.08 +/- 4.21)。体重中位数13.75 kg以上或以下的任何测试单元的偏差差异不超过1%。在非体外循环情况下,所有单元的失效率都很低。体外循环后,Ohmeda绷带未观察到数据丢失;其他单元观察到的停机时间在34%至55%之间。
所选探头类型对儿童脉搏血氧饱和度测定的准确性影响很小。体外循环后,使用Ohmeda绷带组合可能会提高获得一致读数并减少停机时间的可能性。