Wallace W C, Cinat M, Gornick W B, Lekawa M E, Wilson S E
Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange 92868, USA.
Am Surg. 1999 Oct;65(10):987-90.
In 1970, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System to assist institutions with infection surveillance, data collection, and processing. This facilitates interinstitutional comparison for nosocomial infection rates. Nosocomial infection rates in the surgical intensive care unit have been shown to be different from the medical intensive care unit. Whether there exists a difference in infection rates between trauma and surgical patients in the intensive care unit has not been established. Our objective was to determine whether there is a difference in rates of nosocomial infections between trauma and surgical patients in the surgical intensive care unit. From January 1995 through December 1997, we reviewed 3715 admissions to the surgical intensive care unit and separated them into trauma (1272) or surgical (2443) cases. We documented all nosocomial pneumonias, urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, and surgical site infections. From these data we determined infection rates per 100 admissions. We also identified all device-related nosocomial infections and calculated infection rate by current CDC standards using number of device infections divided by number of device-days times 1000. We found that the overall trauma patient infection rate was 11.64 per cent compared with 6.43 per cent for surgical patients (P<.001). Using conventional infection rate criteria, trauma patients had higher frequency in the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (6.13% vs. 2.50%; P<0.001), urinary tract infection (2.36 versus 1.76; P<0.2), and bloodstream infection (2.52% versus 1.27%; P<0.01). However, when using the CDC guidelines, which correct for the number of device-days for infections, only the difference in rate of pneumonia between the two groups reached statistical significance (23.9 rate for trauma patients vs. 16.7 for the surgery group; P<0.005). We conclude that trauma patients are at higher risk for nosocomial infections than routine surgical patients. Because of this difference, centers should collect and report data separately for trauma and surgical patients in the intensive care unit. Specific attention should be focused on the causes and prevention of increased rates of nosocomial pneumonia in trauma patients.
1970年,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)建立了国家医院感染监测系统,以协助各机构进行感染监测、数据收集和处理。这有助于对医院感染率进行机构间比较。已证明外科重症监护病房的医院感染率与内科重症监护病房不同。重症监护病房中创伤患者和外科手术患者的感染率是否存在差异尚未确定。我们的目的是确定外科重症监护病房中创伤患者和外科手术患者的医院感染率是否存在差异。从1995年1月至1997年12月,我们回顾了3715例入住外科重症监护病房的患者,并将他们分为创伤患者(1272例)或外科手术患者(2443例)。我们记录了所有医院获得性肺炎、尿路感染、血流感染和手术部位感染。根据这些数据,我们确定了每100例入院患者的感染率。我们还识别了所有与器械相关的医院感染,并按照美国疾病控制与预防中心的现行标准,用器械感染数除以器械使用天数再乘以1000来计算感染率。我们发现,创伤患者的总体感染率为11.64%,而外科手术患者为6.43%(P<0.001)。采用传统的感染率标准,创伤患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率更高(6.13%对2.50%;P<0.001)、尿路感染(2.36对1.76;P<0.2)和血流感染(2.52%对1.27%;P<0.01)。然而,按照美国疾病控制与预防中心的指南,对感染的器械使用天数进行校正后,两组之间仅肺炎发生率的差异具有统计学意义(创伤患者发生率为23.9,手术组为16.7;P<0.005)。我们得出结论,创伤患者发生医院感染的风险高于常规外科手术患者。由于存在这种差异,各中心应分别收集和报告重症监护病房中创伤患者和外科手术患者的数据。应特别关注创伤患者医院获得性肺炎发生率增加的原因及预防。