Suppr超能文献

农场质量保证计划:生产者与行业领导者意见调查

On-farm quality assurance programs: a survey of producer and industry leader opinions.

作者信息

Payne M, Bruhn C M, Reed B, Scearce A, O'Donnell J

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Californa, Davis 95616-8598, USA.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 1999 Oct;82(10):2224-30. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75469-X.

Abstract

To assess interest in implementing a California dairy quality assurance program, practices and opinions of dairy producers and industry leaders were surveyed by a mailed questionnaire and by focus groups. The majority of the 55 participants in the focus group were dairy producers; processor marketing executives, extension dairy advisors, packinghouse executives, and dairy veterinarians were represented. The consensus among the focus groups was that a quality assurance program should be voluntary, be managed by creameries, and confer an economic advantage to participants. Focus group members listed chemical and microbial food safety (in both meat and milk), environmental health, and animal welfare as issues that should be addressed. Of the 1440 questionnaires mailed with producers' milk checks, 413 were returned. Information was collected regarding opinions and practices pertaining to administration of drugs to animals, medical records and animal identification, culling practices, manure management, cow welfare, and feeding of animal protein. An overwhelming 99% of producers believed they were responsible for the safety of meat and milk leaving the farm. Sixty percent of producers said that they would consider joining a California-specific quality assurance program, whereas 9% indicated that they would not. Producers would be more likely to join if their processor believed it would impart a market advantage and if the program standards were controlled by producers.

摘要

为评估实施加利福尼亚乳制品质量保证计划的意愿,通过邮寄问卷和焦点小组的方式,对乳制品生产商和行业领袖的做法及意见进行了调查。焦点小组的55名参与者中,大部分是乳制品生产商,还包括加工企业营销高管、推广乳制品顾问、包装厂高管和乳制品兽医。焦点小组达成的共识是,质量保证计划应是自愿性的,由乳制品厂管理,并为参与者带来经济优势。焦点小组成员列出了化学和微生物食品安全(包括肉类和牛奶)、环境卫生和动物福利等应解决的问题。随生产商牛奶支票一起邮寄的1440份问卷中,有413份被退回。收集了有关给动物用药管理、病历和动物标识、淘汰做法、粪便管理、奶牛福利以及动物蛋白喂养等方面的意见和做法的信息。绝大多数(99%)生产商认为他们应对离开农场的肉类和牛奶安全负责。60%的生产商表示他们会考虑加入加利福尼亚特定的质量保证计划,而9%的生产商表示不会。如果生产商的加工商认为该计划会带来市场优势,并且计划标准由生产商控制,那么生产商更有可能加入。

相似文献

1
On-farm quality assurance programs: a survey of producer and industry leader opinions.
J Dairy Sci. 1999 Oct;82(10):2224-30. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75469-X.
2
Knowledge and attitudes towards food safety among Canadian dairy producers.
Prev Vet Med. 2010 Apr 1;94(1-2):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.010. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
3
Implementing a quality assurance program using a risk assessment tool on dairy operations.
J Dairy Sci. 1997 Apr;80(4):777-87. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75998-8.
4
Results of drug screening from a producer's view.
J Dairy Sci. 1994 Jul;77(7):1933-5. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77139-3.
6
Attitudes towards the Canadian quality milk program and use of good production practices among Canadian dairy producers.
Prev Vet Med. 2010 Apr 1;94(1-2):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.018. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
7
Attitudes of Canadian dairy farmers toward a voluntary Johne's disease control program.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Apr;93(4):1491-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2447.
8
A comparison of three animal welfare assessment programs on California dairies.
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Apr;88(4):1595-600. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72828-9.
9
Alberta dairy farm survey response.
J Dairy Sci. 1994 Nov;77(11):3460-72. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77289-1.
10
On-farm management decisions to improve beef quality of market dairy cows.
J Dairy Sci. 2004 May;87(5):1558-64. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73308-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验