Nelson S G, Grant E N, Trubitt M J, Foggs M B, Weiss K B
Center for Health Services Research, Rush Primary Care Institute, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Chest. 1999 Oct;116(4 Suppl 1):173S-178S. doi: 10.1378/chest.116.suppl_2.173s.
Managed care, both via staff model health maintenance plans and nonstaff model plans, has become a major source of health-care funding in the United States. However, very little is known about the asthma-specific products and services offered by these plans. The purpose of this study is to examine the asthma-specific products and services offered by managed care within the Chicago area.
Between December 1997 and February 1998, a self-administered survey was mailed to the medical directors of the 19 managed care organizations (MCOs) in the Chicago area. The survey covered the following content areas: general characteristics of the MCOs, asthma-related services, monitoring of asthma care, and asthma-related quality improvement efforts. The medical directors were asked to respond separately for staff model capitated plans, nonstaff model capitated plans, and noncapitated plans.
Responses were received from 13 of the 19 eligible Chicago-area MCOs (a response rate of 68.4%). Three of the responding MCOs (23.1%) offered a staff model plan, 11 (84.6%) offered a nonstaff model capitated plan, and 6 offered some type of noncapitated plan. Asthma education programs, although available in all plan types, were offered much less frequently in the nonstaff model capitated and noncapitated plans, 36.4% and 33.3%, respectively. Asthma case management programs were also available in some, but not all of the health plans. Only 54.5% of the nonstaff model capitated health plans promoted the use of asthma practice guidelines. Among the responding MCOs, asthma quality improvement efforts related to National Committee on Quality Assurance accreditation were infrequent in 1995. Sixty-one percent of the MCOs reported that program development for improving asthma care was a very high priority relative to programs for other health conditions.
The results of this study suggest that many, but not all, of the basic elements of asthma care services are offered by the MCOs in the Chicago area. Findings from this study also suggest ways in which asthma-related product and service delivery might be changed to improve outcomes for asthma in this community.
通过员工模式健康维护计划和非员工模式计划实施的管理式医疗,已成为美国医疗保健资金的主要来源。然而,对于这些计划所提供的哮喘特定产品和服务,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是调查芝加哥地区管理式医疗所提供的哮喘特定产品和服务。
1997年12月至1998年2月期间,向芝加哥地区19家管理式医疗组织(MCO)的医疗主任邮寄了一份自填式调查问卷。该调查涵盖以下内容领域:MCO的一般特征、哮喘相关服务、哮喘护理监测以及哮喘相关质量改进措施。要求医疗主任分别针对员工模式按人头付费计划、非员工模式按人头付费计划和非按人头付费计划做出回应。
19家符合条件的芝加哥地区MCO中有13家回复(回复率为68.4%)。三家回复的MCO(23.1%)提供员工模式计划,11家(84.6%)提供非员工模式按人头付费计划,6家提供某种类型的非按人头付费计划。哮喘教育项目虽然在所有计划类型中都有,但在非员工模式按人头付费计划和非按人头付费计划中提供的频率要低得多,分别为36.4%和33.3%。哮喘病例管理项目在一些但并非所有的健康计划中也有。只有54.5%的非员工模式按人头付费健康计划推广使用哮喘实践指南。在回复的MCO中,1995年与国家质量保证委员会认证相关的哮喘质量改进措施很少。61%的MCO报告称,相对于其他健康状况的项目,改善哮喘护理的项目开发是非常高的优先事项。
本研究结果表明,芝加哥地区的MCO提供了许多但并非所有哮喘护理服务的基本要素。本研究结果还表明了可以改变哮喘相关产品和服务提供方式以改善该社区哮喘治疗效果的方法。