Koswig S, Buchali A, Böhmer D, Schlenger L, Budach V
Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Charité, Humboldt-Universität Berlin.
Strahlenther Onkol. 1999 Oct;175(10):509-14. doi: 10.1007/s000660050062.
The effect of the palliative irradiation of bone metastases was explored in this retrospective analysis. The spectrum of primary tumor sites, the localization of the bone metastases and the fractionation schedules were analyzed with regard to palliation discriminating total, partial and complete pain response.
One hundred seventy-six patients are included in this retrospective quantitative study from April 1992 to November 1993. Two hundred fifty-eight localizations of painful bone metastases were irradiated. The percentage of bone metastases of the total irradiated localizations in our department of radiotherapy in the Charité-Hospital, the primary tumor sites, the localizations and the different fractionation schedules were explored. The total, partial and complete pain response was analyzed in the most often used fractionation schedules and by primary tumor sites.
Eight per cent of all irradiated localizations in the observation period were bone metastases. There were irradiated bone metastases of 21 different tumor sites. Most of the primary tumor sites were breast cancer (49%), lung cancer (6%) and kidney cancer (6%). The most frequent site of metastases was the vertebral column (52%). The most often used fractionation schedules were: 4 x 5 Gy (32%), 10 x 3 Gy (18%), 6 x 5 Gy (9%), 7 x 3 Gy (7%), 10 x 2 Gy (5%) and 2 x 8 Gy. The total response rates in this fractionation schedules were 72%, 79%, 74%, 76%, 75% and 72%, the complete response rates were 35%, 32%, 30%, 35%, 33% and 33%. There were no significant differences between the most often irradiated primary tumor sites, the most frequent localizations and the palliation with regard to total, partial and complete pain response.
There are no differences between the different fractionation schedules with regard to the pain effect of bone metastases. A palliation is ensured in 75% of all cases with a partial response of 42% and complete response of 33%. With regard to pain response these results do not justify a recommendation for a standard fractionation schedule. Current fractionation schedules such as 10 x 3 Gy for 2 weeks or 5 x 4 Gy for 1 week should be used. Another point is the recalcification in the palliative treatment of bone metastases in patients with better prognosis. The recalcification is the basis for stabilization and prevention of fractures. This aspect should be explored in prospective studies.
本回顾性分析探讨了骨转移瘤姑息性放疗的效果。分析了原发肿瘤部位的范围、骨转移瘤的定位以及分割方案,以区分完全、部分和完全疼痛缓解的姑息治疗效果。
本回顾性定量研究纳入了1992年4月至1993年11月期间的176例患者。对258个疼痛性骨转移瘤部位进行了放疗。探讨了我院放疗科全部放疗部位中骨转移瘤的百分比、原发肿瘤部位、转移部位以及不同的分割方案。分析了最常用分割方案以及按原发肿瘤部位划分的完全、部分和完全疼痛缓解情况。
观察期内所有放疗部位中8%为骨转移瘤。共对21种不同肿瘤部位的骨转移瘤进行了放疗。大多数原发肿瘤部位为乳腺癌(49%)、肺癌(6%)和肾癌(6%)。最常见的转移部位是脊柱(52%)。最常用的分割方案为:4×5 Gy(32%)、10×3 Gy(18%)、6×5 Gy(9%)、7×3 Gy(7%)、10×2 Gy(5%)和2×8 Gy。这些分割方案的总缓解率分别为72%、79%、74%、76%、75%和72%,完全缓解率分别为35%、32%、30%、35%、33%和33%。在最常放疗的原发肿瘤部位、最常见转移部位以及完全、部分和完全疼痛缓解的姑息治疗方面,均无显著差异。
不同分割方案在骨转移瘤的疼痛治疗效果方面无差异。所有病例中有75%可实现姑息治疗,其中部分缓解率为42%,完全缓解率为33%。就疼痛缓解而言,这些结果并不足以推荐标准分割方案。应采用当前的分割方案,如2周内10×3 Gy或1周内5×4 Gy。另一个要点是预后较好的患者在骨转移瘤姑息治疗中的再钙化。再钙化是稳定和预防骨折的基础。这方面应在前瞻性研究中进行探索。