Hwang S M, Kang Y C, Lee Y B, Yoon K B, Ahn S K, Choi E H
Department of Dermatology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, South Korea.
Arch Dermatol. 1999 Nov;135(11):1359-64. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.11.1359.
To evaluate the relief of acute pain and possible preventive effects on postherpetic neuralgia through the use of an epidural blockade in the acute stage of herpes zoster.
Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative clinical trial.
A dermatologic clinic in a university hospital.
Sixty-five consecutive patients with pain due to acute herpes zoster were treated for a 7-day hospitalization period from July 1, 1996, through June 30, 1997.
The consecutive patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A consisted of 30 patients who were seen from July 1, 1996, through December 31, 1996, and who were treated with intravenous acyclovir (5 mg/kg) for 7 days. Group B consisted of 35 patients who were seen from January 1, 1997, through June 30, 1997, and who were treated with intravenous acyclovir (5 mg/kg) and an epidural blockade for 7 days. The changes in the intensity of pain and the total duration of pain in both groups were assessed for 12 to 18 months.
The number of days required for relief of pain and the total duration of pain.
The mean +/- SD number of days required for relief of pain, which was rated on a scale of 100 (worst pain) to 0 (no pain), was significantly fewer in group B than in group A: it took 2.6 +/- 1.1 days to go from 100 to 50 on the relief-of-pain scale in group B, but 3.8 +/- 1.1 days in group A (P = .03), and 12.5 +/- 6.4 days to go from 100 to 10 in group B, but 20.1 +/- 14.6 days in group A (P = .04). The duration of late residual pain was significantly shorter in group B (5.9 +/- 5.8 days) than in group A (11.9 +/- 7.5 days) (P = .03). The total duration of pain was also significantly shorter in group B (18.5 +/- 9.3 days) than in group A (31.6 +/- 17.6 days) (P = .04).
We believe that an epidural blockade combined with an antiviral agent is a very effective treatment modality for the pain of acute herpes zoster, and we recommend its use for the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia, with a view to shortening the total duration of pain, especially late residual pain.
通过在带状疱疹急性期使用硬膜外阻滞,评估其对急性疼痛的缓解作用以及对带状疱疹后神经痛可能的预防效果。
前瞻性、非随机、对照临床试验。
大学医院的皮肤科门诊。
1996年7月1日至1997年6月30日期间,连续65例因急性带状疱疹疼痛而住院7天的患者。
将连续患者分为2组。A组30例患者,于1996年7月1日至12月31日就诊,接受静脉注射阿昔洛韦(5mg/kg)治疗7天。B组35例患者,于1997年1月1日至6月30日就诊,接受静脉注射阿昔洛韦(5mg/kg)及硬膜外阻滞治疗7天。对两组患者疼痛强度变化及疼痛总持续时间进行12至18个月的评估。
疼痛缓解所需天数及疼痛总持续时间。
疼痛缓解所需天数的均值±标准差(疼痛程度按100分(最严重疼痛)至0分(无疼痛)评分),B组显著少于A组:B组从疼痛评分1到50分需2.6±1.1天,而A组需3.8±1.1天(P = 0.03);B组从100分降至10分需12.5±6.4天,而A组需20.1±14.6天(P = 0.04)。B组晚期残留疼痛持续时间(5.9±5.8天)显著短于A组(11.9±7.5天)(P = 0.03)。B组疼痛总持续时间(18.5±9.3天)也显著短于A组(31.6±17.6天)(P = 0.04)。
我们认为硬膜外阻滞联合抗病毒药物是治疗急性带状疱疹疼痛的一种非常有效的治疗方式,并且我们建议使用其预防带状疱疹后神经痛,以缩短疼痛总持续时间,尤其是晚期残留疼痛。