McIlroy W E, Maki B E
Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto, 256 McCaul Street, Toronto, Canada.
Gait Posture. 1999 Jul;9(3):190-8. doi: 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00013-2.
Volitional step initiation invariably includes a medio-lateral anticipatory postural adjustment (ML APA), which causes the center of mass (COM) to be propelled toward the stance-limb side prior to the lifting of the swing foot. The present study examined whether this type of anticipatory control plays a functional role in maintaining lateral stability during the rapid compensatory stepping reactions that are evoked when whole-body stability is challenged by unpredictable perturbation. Forward and backward stepping reactions were evaluated in five healthy young adults (ages 22-28) under three task conditions: (1) unconstrained compensatory stepping evoked by platform translation (no specific instructions), (2) constrained compensatory stepping cued by platform translation (prior instruction to step rapidly), and (3) rapid voluntary stepping to a light cue. ML APAs occurred during 70% of perturbation reactions but were too small and brief to have a substantive influence on the lateral movement of the COM occurring during leg lift or swing phase. In contrast, during the light-cued stepping, the ML APA propelled the COM toward the stance-limb side prior to the lifting of the swing limb, and effectively reduced the tendency of the COM to fall toward the swing-limb side during the execution of the step. It is proposed that the presence of an ML APA during compensatory stepping may represent an attempt to preplan a stereotypical stepping response, but that the ability to fully express the anticipatory phase is disrupted by the need to react rapidly to the unpredictable antero-posterior instability imposed by the perturbation. The results suggest that anticipatory control is not the primary mechanism by which the central nervous system deals with the lateral instability arising during rapid compensatory stepping reactions evoked by large, unpredictable antero-posterior perturbation.
自主步起始总是包括一个内侧-外侧预期姿势调整(ML APA),这会使重心(COM)在摆动脚抬起之前朝着支撑腿一侧推进。本研究考察了这种预期控制类型在应对全身稳定性受到不可预测扰动挑战时引发的快速补偿性步反应过程中,对维持侧向稳定性是否发挥功能性作用。在三种任务条件下,对五名健康的年轻成年人(年龄22 - 28岁)的向前和向后步反应进行了评估:(1)平台平移引发的无约束补偿性步(无特定指令),(2)平台平移提示的受限补偿性步(事先指令快速迈步),以及(3)对轻提示的快速自主步。ML APA在70%的扰动反应中出现,但太小且短暂,对抬腿或摆动阶段COM的侧向移动没有实质性影响。相比之下,在轻提示步期间,ML APA在摆动肢体抬起之前将COM朝着支撑腿一侧推进,并有效降低了步执行过程中COM向摆动腿一侧下落的趋势。有人提出,补偿性步期间ML APA的存在可能代表一种预先规划刻板步反应的尝试,但由于需要对扰动施加的不可预测的前后不稳定性快速做出反应,充分表达预期阶段的能力受到了干扰。结果表明,预期控制不是中枢神经系统应对由大的、不可预测的前后扰动引发的快速补偿性步反应期间出现的侧向不稳定性的主要机制。