Suppr超能文献

世卫组织MONICA项目19个人群中,用于识别超重或肥胖个体的腰围行动水平的不同敏感性。

Varying sensitivity of waist action levels to identify subjects with overweight or obesity in 19 populations of the WHO MONICA Project.

作者信息

Molarius A, Seidell J C, Sans S, Tuomilehto J, Kuulasmaa K

机构信息

MONICA Data Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Dec;52(12):1213-24. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00114-6.

Abstract

It has been suggested in the literature that cut-off points based on waist circumference (waist action levels) should replace cut-off points based on body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio in identifying subjects with overweight or obesity. In this article, we examine the sensitivity and specificity of the cut-off points when applied to 19 populations with widely different prevalences of overweight. Our design was a cross-sectional study based on random population samples. A total of 32,978 subjects aged 25-64 years from 19 male and 18 female populations participating in the second MONICA survey from 1987 to 1992 were included in this study. We found that at waist action level 1 (waist circumference > or =94 cm in men and > or =80 cm in women), sensitivity varied between 40% and 80% in men and between 51% and 86% in women between populations when compared with the cut-off points based on BMI (> or =25 kg/m2) and waist-to-hip ratio (> or =0.95 for men, > or =0.80 for women). Specificity was high (> or =90%) in all populations. At waist action level 2 (waist circumference > or =102 cm and > or =88 cm in men and women, respectively, BMI > or =30 kg/m2), sensitivity varied from 22% to 64% in men and from 26% to 67% in women, whereas specificity was >95% in all populations. Sensitivity was in general lowest in populations in which overweight was relatively uncommon, whereas it was highest in populations with relatively high prevalence of overweight. We propose that cut-off points based on waist circumference as a replacement for cut-off points based on BMI and waist-to-hip ratio should be viewed with caution. Based on the proposed waist action levels, very few people would unnecessarily be advised to have weight management, but a varying proportion of those who would need it might be missed. The optimal screening cut-off points for waist circumference may be population specific.

摘要

文献中有人提出,在识别超重或肥胖个体时,基于腰围的切点(腰围行动水平)应取代基于体重指数(BMI)和腰臀比的切点。在本文中,我们研究了这些切点应用于19个超重患病率差异很大的人群时的敏感性和特异性。我们的设计是一项基于随机人群样本的横断面研究。本研究纳入了1987年至1992年参与第二次莫尼卡调查的19个男性和18个女性人群中年龄在25至64岁的32978名受试者。我们发现,在腰围行动水平1(男性腰围≥94厘米,女性腰围≥80厘米)时,与基于BMI(≥25千克/平方米)和腰臀比(男性≥0.95,女性≥0.80)的切点相比,各人群中男性的敏感性在40%至80%之间,女性的敏感性在51%至86%之间。所有人群的特异性都很高(≥90%)。在腰围行动水平2(男性腰围≥102厘米,女性腰围≥88厘米,BMI≥30千克/平方米)时,男性的敏感性在22%至64%之间,女性的敏感性在26%至67%之间,而所有人群的特异性均>95%。一般来说,在超重相对不常见的人群中敏感性最低,而在超重患病率相对较高的人群中敏感性最高。我们建议,应谨慎看待基于腰围的切点取代基于BMI和腰臀比的切点这一建议。基于提议的腰围行动水平,很少有人会被不必要地建议进行体重管理,但可能会遗漏不同比例需要进行体重管理的人。腰围的最佳筛查切点可能因人群而异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验