Rutledge T, Linden W, Davies R F
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Psychosom Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;61(6):834-41. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199911000-00018.
Numerous research findings support the proposed connection between such psychological characteristics as stress and hostility and the manifestation of disease. However, less evidence is available concerning the role(s) psychological factors might play in the process of disease recovery.
Eighty patients with known coronary disease and exercise-induced ischemia underwent treadmill exercise testing and 48-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and completed a battery of standardized psychological tests assessing hostility, depression, and daily stress on four occasions during a 12-week pharmacological treatment study. After withdrawal of antiischemic drugs at baseline, patients returned for subsequent tests at 3-week intervals. During the second and third intervals, patients were prescribed one of two antiischemic medications, atenolol or amlodipine, or given a placebo. All patients were then placed on a combination treatment protocol for the 3 weeks before the final testing date.
The combination treatment produced highly significant benefits across all measured cardiac variables (20.3% improvement in exercise performance, 13% reduction in reported angina, 64.0% reduction in the frequency of ischemic episodes; for all, p < .01). However, results showed that high baseline levels of daily stress were associated with reliably smaller treatment effects on measures of ischemia frequency and treadmill exercise time and with a significantly greater likelihood of reporting angina after treatment (r = -0.24, -0.25, and -0.33, respectively; p <.05). In addition, high baseline hostility predicted significantly smaller diastolic blood pressure improvements (r = -0.29, p < .05).
These results indicate that psychological risk factors may have globally negative effects on the course of treatment and suggest particular factors that may warrant attention in trials targeting cardiac symptom reduction.
众多研究结果支持压力和敌意等心理特征与疾病表现之间的假定联系。然而,关于心理因素在疾病康复过程中可能发挥的作用,证据较少。
80名已知患有冠心病且有运动诱发缺血的患者接受了跑步机运动测试和48小时动态心电图监测,并在一项为期12周的药物治疗研究中四次完成了一系列标准化心理测试,以评估敌意、抑郁和日常压力。在基线时停用抗缺血药物后,患者每隔3周返回进行后续测试。在第二和第三阶段,患者被给予两种抗缺血药物之一,阿替洛尔或氨氯地平,或给予安慰剂。然后所有患者在最后测试日期前3周接受联合治疗方案。
联合治疗在所有测量的心脏变量方面产生了非常显著的益处(运动表现提高20.3%,报告的心绞痛减少13%,缺血发作频率减少64.0%;所有p <.01)。然而,结果表明,高基线日常压力水平与对缺血频率和跑步机运动时间测量的治疗效果可靠地较小相关,并且与治疗后报告心绞痛的可能性显著增加相关(分别为r = -0.24、-0.25和-0.33;p <.05)。此外,高基线敌意预测舒张压改善显著较小(r = -0.29,p <.05)。
这些结果表明,心理风险因素可能对治疗过程产生总体负面影响,并提示在以减少心脏症状为目标的试验中可能需要关注的特定因素。