Friedman P M, Fogelman J P, Nouri K, Levine V J, Ashinoff R
Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Dermatol Surg. 1999 Dec;25(12):950-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.99138.x.
With the emergence of new laser and dermatologic procedures, the need for more effective topical anesthesia continues to grow. There are now several topical anesthetics that are being used prior to laser and surgical procedures.
To compare the degree and duration of anesthesia produced by four commonly used topical anesthetics, we performed a prospective study investigating the efficacy of EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics), ELA-Max, 4% tetracaine gel, and betacaine-LA ointment (formerly eutectic-LA).
Equal amounts of the above topical anesthetics plus a control (eucerin cream) were applied to 10 test sites under occlusion on the volar forearms of 12 adult volunteers. After a 60-minute application time, the degree of anesthesia was assessed immediately by a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser at 1064 nm. Pain testing was also performed 30 minutes after the 60-minute application period. Volunteer responses to pain stimuli were recorded using an ordinal scale of 0 (no pain) to 4 (maximal pain). The mean scores for the time intervals were obtained. Analysis of the data was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Newman-Keuls test, Friedman rank order test, and paired t-tests.
ELA-Max, EMLA, and tetracaine were statistically superior to control after the 60-minute application period. Thirty minutes later, ELA-Max, EMLA, tetracaine, and betacaine-LA were all statistically superior to the control. Comparing individual anesthetics, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics at both time intervals. Although the mean pain scores for each anesthetic were lower 30 minutes after their removal, the differences did not reach statistical significance.
This is the first prospective study comparing the efficacy of several new topical anesthetic agents. Using the methodology of this study, in which the anesthetics were applied under occlusion, ELA-Max and EMLA were the superior anesthetics after a 60-minute application time and 30 minutes later. In addition, there was a clinical increase in efficacy suggested with all of the anesthetics 30 minutes after their removal.
随着新型激光和皮肤科手术的出现,对更有效的局部麻醉的需求持续增长。目前有几种局部麻醉剂在激光和外科手术前使用。
为比较四种常用局部麻醉剂产生的麻醉程度和持续时间,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,调查复方利多卡因乳膏(局部麻醉剂的共熔混合物)、ELA-Max、4%丁卡因凝胶和倍他卡因-LA软膏(原共熔-LA)的疗效。
将等量的上述局部麻醉剂加一种对照物(优色林乳膏)涂于12名成年志愿者掌侧前臂的10个测试部位并封闭。在涂抹60分钟后,立即用1064nm的调Q Nd:YAG激光评估麻醉程度。在60分钟涂抹期后30分钟也进行疼痛测试。使用从0(无疼痛)到4(最大疼痛)的有序量表记录志愿者对疼痛刺激的反应。获得各时间间隔的平均分数。使用方差分析(ANOVA)、纽曼-丘尔斯检验、弗里德曼秩和检验和配对t检验进行数据分析。
在60分钟涂抹期后,ELA-Max、复方利多卡因乳膏和丁卡因在统计学上优于对照物。30分钟后,ELA-Max、复方利多卡因乳膏、丁卡因和倍他卡因-LA在统计学上均优于对照物。比较各麻醉剂,ELA-Max和复方利多卡因乳膏在两个时间间隔都是较好的麻醉剂。虽然每种麻醉剂去除后30分钟的平均疼痛评分较低,但差异未达到统计学显著性。
这是第一项比较几种新型局部麻醉剂疗效的前瞻性研究。采用本研究中在封闭状态下涂抹麻醉剂的方法,ELA-Max和复方利多卡因乳膏在涂抹60分钟后及30分钟后是较好的麻醉剂。此外,所有麻醉剂在去除30分钟后临床疗效均有提高。