Hendryx-Bedalov P M
Eastern Washington University, Department of Communication Disorders, Cheney 99004, USA.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1999;49(2):127-48. doi: 10.2190/KQY0-VC2Q-0RG1-B9NL.
Three clinical and three matched nonclinical couples were studied for the effectiveness of their discourse in eliciting outcomes to requests made. Caregivers in the clinical couples were less likely to achieve successful outcomes than dominant communicators in the nonclinical couples. In studying the context for the requests, differences could not be attributed to the degree of concreteness of reference that was used by caregivers of spouses with Dementia of the Alzheimer type. More abstract and less abstract references were equally likely to be responded to by two of the three clinical couples. Differences in the styles of communication by the caregivers contributed to outcomes and reflected a self-reported degree of strain or comfort in the couples' relationships. Suggested is a method of study of outcomes that could be used in clinical assessment and intervention for nonresponsiveness and noncompliance with dementia patients.
对三对临床夫妻和三对匹配的非临床夫妻进行了研究,以考察他们的话语在引出对所提请求的回应结果方面的有效性。临床夫妻中的照料者比非临床夫妻中的主导沟通者获得成功结果的可能性更小。在研究请求的背景时,差异不能归因于阿尔茨海默型痴呆配偶的照料者所使用的指称具体程度。三对临床夫妻中有两对,对较抽象和不太抽象的指称做出回应的可能性是一样的。照料者沟通方式的差异导致了不同结果,并且反映了夫妻关系中自我报告的压力或舒适度。本文提出了一种可用于对痴呆患者无反应和不依从情况进行临床评估及干预的结果研究方法。