Suppr超能文献

对临终者的照护是否正在改善?专科医生和非专科医生在姑息治疗中的贡献。

Is care of the dying improving? The contribution of specialist and non-specialist to palliative care.

作者信息

Fordham S, Dowrick C

机构信息

Department of Primary Care, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1999 Dec;16(6):573-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/16.6.573.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify and synthesize evidence from studies examining the quality of care of dying patients in both specialist and general practitioner care.

METHOD

Review of published research identified by online and manual searches.

RESULTS

Three large, population-based surveys were identified, carried out between 1969 and 1990, and five randomized controlled trials of specialist palliative care programmes. There were, in addition, a small number of comparative studies and a large volume of descriptive, qualitative material. Some studies identified major methodological problems and the overall quality was poor. Most research concerned selected patients with neoplasms, particularly in settings where specialist palliative care teams are available. There was minimal information about the care of patients dying from non-neoplastic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited evidence of improvements in the care of selected cancer patients, and a dearth of evidence concerning patients dying from other, more common causes. The methods of research used to date are of limited current utility and new methods are required.

摘要

目的

识别并综合各项研究的证据,这些研究探讨了专科医生和全科医生对临终患者的护理质量。

方法

通过在线搜索和人工检索,对已发表的研究进行综述。

结果

确定了三项1969年至1990年间开展的大型基于人群的调查,以及五项专科姑息治疗项目的随机对照试验。此外,还有少量比较研究和大量描述性、定性资料。一些研究发现了主要的方法学问题,整体质量较差。大多数研究关注的是特定的肿瘤患者,尤其是在有专科姑息治疗团队的环境中。关于非肿瘤疾病临终患者护理的信息极少。

结论

关于特定癌症患者护理改善的证据有限,而关于死于其他更常见病因患者的证据匮乏。迄今为止所采用的研究方法目前效用有限,需要新的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验