Vanham G, van Tendeloo V, Willems B, Penne L, Kestens L, Beirnaert E, Fransen K, Heyndrickx L, Zhong P, Davis D, Berneman Z, van Der Groen G, Van Bockstaele D
Laboratory of Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
J Med Virol. 2000 Mar;60(3):300-12.
During sexual transmission, HIV infects the mucosal dendritic cells and is transferred to CD4 T cells. Whether HIV variants of a particular genetic (sub)type or phenotype selectively infect dendritic cells (DC) or are preferentially transferred to T cells remains highly controversial. To avoid the cumbersome use of primary dendritic cells, in vitro dendritic cell models were generated from precursors, either hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) or monocytes (MO). Productive infection in the dendritic cells and transfer of the virus to T cells was assessed for a range of HIV variants. HPC-derived dendritic cells (HPC-DC) were more susceptible to HIV-1 than to HIV-2 isolates. The HIV-1 group O strains were more productive in HPC-DC than group M, but amongst the latter, no subtype-related difference was observed. Both non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) and SI HIV isolates and lab strains could productively infect HPC-DC, albeit with a different efficiency. Adding blocking antibodies confirmed that both CCR-5 and CXCR-4 co-receptors were functional. Biological HIV-1 clones of the NSI/R5 phenotype infected more readily HPC-DC than SI/X4 clones. MO-derived dendritic cells were, however, more exclusive in their preference for NSI/R5 clones. Some HIV variants, that did not grow readily in HPC-DC alone, could be rescued by adding resting or pre-activated T cells. The present data show that HIV-2 isolates and SI clones replicate less in model-DC, but no preference for a particular HIV-1 subtype was evident. Co-culture with T cells could "correct" a limited growth in dendritic cells. Clearly, both intrinsic dendritic cell susceptibility and enhancement by T cells are explained only partly by HIV genotype and phenotype. The in vitro dendritic cell models seem useful tools to further unravel interactions between HIV, DC, and T cells.
在性传播过程中,HIV感染黏膜树突状细胞并转移至CD4 T细胞。特定基因(亚)型或表型的HIV变体是否选择性感染树突状细胞(DC)或优先转移至T细胞仍极具争议。为避免使用原代树突状细胞的繁琐,体外树突状细胞模型由前体细胞生成,即造血祖细胞(HPC)或单核细胞(MO)。针对一系列HIV变体评估了其在树突状细胞中的有效感染及病毒向T细胞的转移情况。HPC来源的树突状细胞(HPC-DC)对HIV-1比对HIV-2分离株更易感。HIV-1 O组毒株在HPC-DC中的增殖能力比M组更强,但在M组中未观察到亚型相关差异。非合胞体诱导(NSI)和SI HIV分离株以及实验室毒株均可有效感染HPC-DC,尽管效率不同。添加阻断抗体证实CCR-5和CXCR-4共受体均有功能。NSI/R5表型的生物HIV-1克隆比SI/X4克隆更易感染HPC-DC。然而,MO来源的树突状细胞对NSI/R5克隆的偏好性更强。一些在单独的HPC-DC中不易生长的HIV变体,可通过添加静息或预激活的T细胞来挽救。目前的数据表明,HIV-2分离株和SI克隆在模型DC中的复制较少,但未明显表现出对特定HIV-1亚型的偏好。与T细胞共培养可“纠正”树突状细胞中有限的生长。显然,树突状细胞的内在易感性和T细胞的增强作用仅部分由HIV基因型和表型来解释。体外树突状细胞模型似乎是进一步阐明HIV、DC和T细胞之间相互作用的有用工具。