Reilly S, Trifunovic R
Department of Psychology, The University of Illinois at Chicago, 60607, USA.
Behav Neurosci. 1999 Dec;113(6):1242-8.
Neurologically intact rats expecting to receive a high-value reward (1.0 M sucrose), licked less for an unexpected low-value reward (0.15% saccharin) than did control subjects that only received the saccharin solution. This reward comparison effect, termed successive negative contrast, was eliminated after bilateral electrolytic lesions of the gustatory thalamus. The results are discussed in terms of disrupted memory processes that may have rendered the lesioned rats incapable of computing the relative reward value of the available solution (0.15% saccharin) with respect to the memory of the preferred solution (1.0 M sucrose).
神经系统完好且预期会获得高价值奖励(1.0 M蔗糖)的大鼠,比起仅接受糖精溶液的对照大鼠,对于意外的低价值奖励(0.15%糖精)舔舐得更少。这种奖励比较效应,称为连续负性对比,在味觉丘脑双侧电解损伤后消失。结果从记忆过程中断的角度进行了讨论,这可能使损伤的大鼠无法根据对偏好溶液(1.0 M蔗糖)的记忆来计算可用溶液(0.15%糖精)的相对奖励价值。