Wong N A, Willott J, Kendall M J, Sheffield E A
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK.
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Aug;52(8):593-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.8.593.
To determine whether the measurement of vascularity can be used to differentiate follicular adenomas from follicular carcinomas or to reflect the prognosis of follicular carcinomas and papillary carcinomas of the thyroid gland, and to compare four methods of assessing vascularity.
Tissue sections from 26 papillary carcinomas, 15 follicular adenomas, and 15 follicular carcinomas were stained with an antibody to CD34. A computerised image analysis system was used to calculate, for each tumour, mean endothelial areas and the mean endothelium to tumour epithelial nucleus area ratio from 10 systematically selected fields across one dimension of the tumour ("systematic field" analysis) or from the three most vascularised fields of the tumour ("hot spot" analysis). A European Organisation for Research on Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) prognostic index was calculated for each papillary carcinoma and follicular carcinoma.
Significant differences in vascularity between the three tumour groups could only be shown by comparing mean endothelial area values measured from hot spots. While the hot spot median mean endothelial area of follicular carcinomas was significantly greater than that of follicular adenomas, there was a large overlap between the two groups. For follicular carcinomas, higher hot spot mean endothelial area values were related to worse prognosis as indicated by the EORTC prognostic indices. No association between vascularity and prognosis was found for the papillary carcinomas, regardless of the method of assessing vascularity.
Measuring endothelial area from hot spots using a computerised image analysis system is a sensitive method of assessing the vascularity of thyroid tumours. While vascularity measurement cannot be recommended as a practical tool for differentiating between malignant and benign follicular tumours, the suggestion that vascularity may reflect prognosis for follicular carcinomas deserves further study.
确定血管测量是否可用于鉴别滤泡性腺瘤与滤泡性癌,或反映甲状腺滤泡性癌和乳头状癌的预后,并比较四种评估血管的方法。
用抗CD34抗体对26例乳头状癌、15例滤泡性腺瘤和15例滤泡性癌的组织切片进行染色。使用计算机图像分析系统,针对每个肿瘤,从肿瘤一个维度上系统选择的10个视野(“系统视野”分析)或从肿瘤血管最丰富的三个视野(“热点”分析)计算平均内皮面积以及平均内皮与肿瘤上皮细胞核面积比。为每个乳头状癌和滤泡性癌计算欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)预后指数。
只有通过比较从热点测量的平均内皮面积值,才能显示出三组肿瘤在血管方面的显著差异。虽然滤泡性癌的热点中位平均内皮面积显著大于滤泡性腺瘤,但两组之间有很大重叠。对于滤泡性癌,较高的热点平均内皮面积值与EORTC预后指数所示的较差预后相关。无论评估血管的方法如何,均未发现乳头状癌的血管与预后之间存在关联。
使用计算机图像分析系统从热点测量内皮面积是评估甲状腺肿瘤血管的一种敏感方法。虽然血管测量不能作为区分滤泡性恶性肿瘤和良性肿瘤的实用工具推荐,但血管可能反映滤泡性癌预后的这一观点值得进一步研究。