Dain S J, Hoskin A K, Winder C, Dingsdag D P
School of Optometry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999 Jul;19(4):357-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00418.x.
The propensity for occupational eye protectors to fog in warm and moist conditions is often offered as a reason by workers not to wear occupational eye protection even where mandatory eye protection areas have been specified. A study of eye protection practices in the New South Wales coal mining industry identified the number one issue in underground coal mine conditions as being fogging of eye safety wear. Conventional anti-fog treatments and cleaners were considered by the miners as completely inadequate in these conditions. At the time of the study claims were being made for a new generation of lens treatments. These merited evaluation. Spectacles and goggles claimed to be fog resistant were obtained from manufacturers and suppliers and subjected to the test set out in BS EN 168 and the compliance criterion of BS EN 166. Some lenses claimed to be fog resistant failed the requirement, some new technology lenses showed arguably superior performance but failed the criterion of the standard. Modifications to the test procedure of BS EN 168 and acceptance criteria of BS EN 166 are proposed.
即使在已指定强制佩戴眼部防护装备区域的情况下,工人往往也会以职业护眼装备在温暖潮湿环境中容易起雾为由,不佩戴职业护眼装备。一项对新南威尔士州煤矿行业眼部防护措施的研究表明,地下煤矿环境中的首要问题是眼部安全装备起雾。矿工们认为,在这些环境中,传统的防雾处理和清洁剂完全不够用。在研究进行时,新一代镜片处理技术正在被宣称。这些技术值得评估。从制造商和供应商处获取了声称具有防雾功能的眼镜和护目镜,并按照BS EN 168规定的测试方法以及BS EN 166的合格标准进行测试。一些声称具有防雾功能的镜片未达到要求,一些新技术镜片虽表现出可说是更优越的性能,但未达到标准的标准。建议对BS EN 168的测试程序和BS EN 166的验收标准进行修改。