Suppr超能文献

血管性血友病因子、组织因子途径抑制物和血栓调节蛋白这三种内皮特异性蛋白的血浆水平不能预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征的发生。

Plasma levels of the three endothelial-specific proteins von Willebrand factor, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, and thrombomodulin do not predict the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Bajaj M S, Tricomi S M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1999 Nov;25(11):1259-66. doi: 10.1007/s001340051054.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the plasma levels of three endothelial-specific proteins, von Willebrand factor (vWF), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) and thrombomodulin (TM) may be useful in predicting the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

DESIGN

Blood samples were obtained from normal healthy volunteers and on the first day from patients at risk for ARDS and those with ARDS. Daily sequential measurements of vWF and TFPI were performed in two patients.

SETTING

Normal subjects were employees at Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri. Patients at risk and those with ARDS were patients admitted to the medical and surgical floors and the intensive care units at St. Louis University Hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Plasma levels of vWF, TFPI and TM were measured in 27 normals, and on day 1 in 15 patients at risk for ARDS and 18 patients with ARDS from different etiologic factors.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Plasma levels of vWF were significantly elevated in the at-risk (p < 0.01) and ARDS group (p < 0.001) as compared to normals but did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05). Plasma levels of TFPI were not significantly different between the normal and the at-risk group (p > 0.05); however, they were significantly elevated in ARDS as compared with at-risk and normal groups (p < 0.001). Levels of TM were significantly increased in the at-risk group as compared to normals (p < 0.01) but were not significantly different from the ARDS group (p > 0.05). Eight patients at risk progressed to develop ARDS. A vWF level of > 300% in patients at risk was 62% sensitive and 71% specific for predicting the development of ARDS with a positive predictive value of only 34%. TFPI levels were normal in 7 of the 8 patients who developed ARDS. A TM level of > 100 ng/ml in patients at risk was 50% sensitive and 57% specific with a positive predictive value of merely 8% for development of ARDS. There was no significant difference in the mean plasma levels of the three proteins on day 1 in patients at risk who developed ARDS as compared with those who did not develop ARDS. There was also no difference in mean plasma levels of the three proteins in patients with ARDS from sepsis as compared with ARDS from other etiologies. Plasma levels of vWF and TFPI correlated significantly.

CONCLUSION

Plasma levels of vWF, TFPI and TM did not appear to serve as useful markers for predicting ARDS in patients at risk.

摘要

目的

确定三种内皮细胞特异性蛋白,即血管性血友病因子(vWF)、组织因子途径抑制物(TFPI)和血栓调节蛋白(TM)的血浆水平是否有助于预测急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的发生。

设计

从正常健康志愿者以及ARDS高危患者和ARDS患者入院第一天采集血样。对两名患者每日连续测量vWF和TFPI。

设置

正常受试者为密苏里州圣路易斯市圣路易斯大学医院的员工。ARDS高危患者和ARDS患者为入住圣路易斯大学医院内科、外科病房及重症监护病房的患者。

患者和参与者

测量了27名正常人以及15名ARDS高危患者和18名不同病因的ARDS患者第一天的vWF、TFPI和TM血浆水平。

测量和结果

与正常人相比,高危组(p < 0.01)和ARDS组(p < 0.001)的vWF血浆水平显著升高,但两组之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。正常组和高危组之间的TFPI血浆水平无显著差异(p > 0.05);然而,与高危组和正常组相比,ARDS组的TFPI水平显著升高(p < 0.001)。与正常人相比,高危组的TM水平显著升高(p < 0.01),但与ARDS组无显著差异(p > 0.05)。8名高危患者进展为ARDS。高危患者vWF水平> 300%对预测ARDS发生的敏感性为62%,特异性为71%,阳性预测值仅为34%。发生ARDS的8名患者中有7名TFPI水平正常。高危患者TM水平> 100 ng/ml对ARDS发生的敏感性为50%,特异性为57%,阳性预测值仅为8%。发生ARDS的高危患者与未发生ARDS的高危患者第一天三种蛋白的平均血浆水平无显著差异。脓毒症所致ARDS患者与其他病因所致ARDS患者三种蛋白的平均血浆水平也无差异。vWF和TFPI的血浆水平显著相关。

结论

vWF、TFPI和TM的血浆水平似乎不能作为预测高危患者发生ARDS的有用标志物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验