Heederik D, Doekes G, Nieuwenhuijsen M J
Environmental and Occupational Health Group, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Occup Environ Med. 1999 Nov;56(11):735-41. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.11.735.
An important group of sensitising agents are so called high molecular weight sensitisers--proteins or glycoproteins with molecular weights in the 5-70 kDa range that can provoke a specific IgE response in workers exposed to these agents. Exposure to high molecular weight sensitisers could only be evaluated indirectly in the recent past. Few measurement techniques existed that made it possible to measure the allergens directly. As a result, few studies focused on establishing exposure-response relations, and exposure standards have not been established for high molecular weight sensitisers, or those that have are of doubtful scientific basis. Recent use of immunoassays changed this perspective dramatically. Antibodies used in the assays can originate from human serum (sensitized workers), serum from sensitised animals (rabbits producing polyclonal antibodies), or animal derived cell cultures producing monoclonal antibodies. Although few comparative studies exist, the available evidence suggests that although the correlation of allergen concentrations obtained with different assays is good, large systematic differences occur. The use of conversion factors to make data from previously performed allergen measurements comparable or exchangeable is limited and thorough standardization of assays is preferred. Validation and comparison of different assays by comparisons between laboratories seem important issues that have not received the attention needed. Epidemiological studies in several industries that used immunoassay for the exposure characterisation have shown that risk of sensitisation increases with increasing exposure to allergens. Several studies have also shown that clear differences in potency seem to exist. Sensitisation to rat urinary allergens and fungal alpha-amylase occurred in the pg/m3 and ng/m3 range. The main research questions of the near future have to focus on the prevention of occupational sensitisation. Standard setting seems possible for some allergenson the basis of the available scientific evidence for the existence of exposure response relations. However, assays for characterising exposure to allergens have to be rigorously standardised before they can be used under field conditions.
一类重要的致敏剂是所谓的高分子量致敏原——分子量在5至70 kDa范围内的蛋白质或糖蛋白,它们可在接触这些物质的工人中引发特异性IgE反应。过去,高分子量致敏原的暴露只能间接评估。当时几乎没有能够直接测量过敏原的检测技术。因此,很少有研究关注建立暴露-反应关系,而且尚未为高分子量致敏原制定暴露标准,即便有,其科学依据也值得怀疑。免疫测定法的近期应用极大地改变了这一局面。测定中使用的抗体可源自人血清(致敏工人)、致敏动物血清(产生多克隆抗体的兔子)或产生单克隆抗体的动物源细胞培养物。尽管很少有比较研究,但现有证据表明,虽然不同检测方法测得的过敏原浓度相关性良好,但仍存在较大的系统差异。使用转换因子使先前进行的过敏原测量数据具有可比性或可互换性的做法有限,因此最好对检测进行全面标准化。通过实验室间比较对不同检测方法进行验证和比较似乎是重要问题,但尚未得到应有的关注。多个行业中使用免疫测定法进行暴露特征描述的流行病学研究表明,致敏风险随过敏原暴露增加而升高。多项研究还表明,效力似乎存在明显差异。对大鼠尿液过敏原和真菌α淀粉酶的致敏发生在pg/m³和ng/m³范围内。近期的主要研究问题必须聚焦于职业致敏的预防。基于现有关于暴露-反应关系存在的科学证据,为某些过敏原设定标准似乎是可行的。然而,用于表征过敏原暴露的检测方法在可用于现场条件之前必须进行严格标准化。