Bråthen G, Bjerve K S, Brodtkorb E, Bovim G
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;68(3):342-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.3.342.
The role of alcohol misuse in the genesis of seizures is probably often undetected. The aim was to investigate the utility of carbohydrate deficient transferrin (CDT) compared with other biomarkers and clinical examination in the diagnosis of alcohol related seizures.
The study included consecutively 158 seizure patients-83 men and 75 women-with mean age 45 (16-79) years. Seizures related to alcohol use were identified by a score > or =8 in the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT positive). AUDIT was applied as the gold standard to which sensitivity and specificity of the various markers were related. Blood samples were obtained from 150 patients on admission and analysed for ethanol, liver enzymes, and CDT, using AXIS Biochemicals' %CDT-TIA kit.
53 patients (34%) were AUDIT positive. Using the commonly applied decision value for %CDT of 5.0%, a sensitivity of 41% and a specificity of 84% were obtained. Analysis of receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves disclosed an optimal cut off value for %CDT of 5.4%, which yielded a sensitivity of 39% and a specificity of 88%. At a specificity of 80%, the sensitivity was 43% for %CDT and 26% for GGT. The %CDT sensitivity was markedly higher for men than for women. Compared with GGT, ASAT, ALAT, and ASAT/ALAT ratio, CDT was the best single biomarker for alcohol related seizures. However, even in the subgroup of withdrawal seizures, the sensitivity level barely exceeded 50%. Clinicians scored alcohol as the main cause of the seizure in only 19 cases (12%). In 38 (24%) cases, clinicians suspected that alcohol had a role (sensitivity of 62% at a specificity of 89%). Their ability to identify AUDIT positive patients was better than that of any biomarker, but many cases were missed. Agreement of clinicians' scores to CDT was only fair (kappa=0.28). CDT concentrations were significantly increased among alcohol abstaining patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs. Six out of 16 patients with false positive CDT results were exposed to such drugs.
CDT is not recommended as a stand alone marker for alcohol related seizures, but may provide a useful contribution to the overall diagnostic investigation of seizures. Confirmatory studies are needed as to the apparent vulnerability of CDT to antiepileptic drugs.
酒精滥用在癫痫发作成因中的作用可能常常未被察觉。本研究旨在探讨与其他生物标志物及临床检查相比,缺糖转铁蛋白(CDT)在诊断酒精相关性癫痫发作中的效用。
本研究连续纳入了158例癫痫患者,其中男性83例,女性75例,平均年龄45岁(16 - 79岁)。通过酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT阳性,评分≥8分)来确定与酒精使用相关的癫痫发作。将AUDIT作为金标准,各种标志物的敏感性和特异性与之相关。在150例患者入院时采集血样,使用AXIS Biochemicals公司的%CDT - TIA试剂盒分析乙醇、肝酶和CDT。
53例患者(34%)AUDIT阳性。使用%CDT常用的判定值5.0%,敏感性为41%,特异性为84%。对受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析显示,%CDT的最佳截断值为5.4%,敏感性为39%,特异性为88%。在特异性为80%时,%CDT的敏感性为43%,γ - 谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)的敏感性为26%。%CDT对男性的敏感性明显高于女性。与GGT、谷草转氨酶(ASAT)、谷丙转氨酶(ALAT)及ASAT/ALAT比值相比,CDT是酒精相关性癫痫发作的最佳单一生物标志物。然而,即使在戒断性癫痫发作亚组中,敏感性水平也仅略超过50%。临床医生仅在19例(12%)病例中将酒精列为癫痫发作的主要原因。在38例(24%)病例中,临床医生怀疑酒精起了作用(特异性为89%时敏感性为62%)。他们识别AUDIT阳性患者的能力优于任何生物标志物,但仍有许多病例被漏诊。临床医生评分与CDT的一致性仅为一般(kappa = 0.28)。在服用酶诱导性抗癫痫药物的戒酒患者中,CDT浓度显著升高。16例CDT结果假阳性的患者中有6例使用了此类药物。
不推荐将CDT作为酒精相关性癫痫发作的独立标志物,但它可能对癫痫发作的整体诊断调查有一定帮助。对于CDT对抗癫痫药物的明显易感性,需要进行确证性研究。