相似文献
1
Clinton's farewell gift to US science agencies.
Nature. 2000 Feb 10;403(6770):585. doi: 10.1038/35001215.
2
U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1662-3. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5702.1662.
3
Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
Nature. 2000 Nov 16;408(6810):279. doi: 10.1038/35042719.
4
1997 budget confirms US science faces a period of flat funding.
Nature. 1996 Mar 21;380(6571):187. doi: 10.1038/380187a0.
5
NSF does well, NIH does not in Clinton's 1994 budget.
Nature. 1993 Apr 1;362(6419):382-3. doi: 10.1038/362382a0.
6
U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
Science. 2002 Nov 15;298(5597):1313. doi: 10.1126/science.298.5597.1313a.
7
Main agencies hang on to funds in skimpy US science budget.
Nature. 2005 Feb 10;433(7026):559-60. doi: 10.1038/433559a.
8
U.S. research funding. Science adviser says that pruning is the key to a healthy budget.
Science. 2007 Feb 16;315(5814):927. doi: 10.1126/science.315.5814.927.
9
"Glocal" science advocacy.
Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):877. doi: 10.1126/science.1155656.
10
Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.
Science. 2005 Feb 11;307(5711):832-4. doi: 10.1126/science.307.5711.832a.
Zotero 插件