Fujikawa K, Matsui Y, Fukuzawa S, Takeuchi H
Department of Urology, Kobe City General Hospital, Kobe City, Japan.
Eur Urol. 2000 Feb;37(2):218-22. doi: 10.1159/000020121.
Some authors have recently reported that maximum androgen block (MAB), in which the nonsteroidal anti-androgen, flutamide, is used together with conventional hormone therapy such as castration or luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue, is more effective for prostate cancer than conventional methods. However, others have reported that the effect of MAB on survival is minimal, and definite conclusions concerning MAB remain unclear. Conversely, using flutamide as a second-line hormone therapy after recurrence is also considered, but few authors have reported whether this therapeutic option is effective or for which patients it is effective.
124 patients with prostate cancer were diagnosed and followed at Kobe City General Hospital between 1995 and 1997. Twenty-two of these cases developed recurrence during first-line hormone therapy, and flutamide was prescribed in these cases. The prognostic value and effectiveness of flutamide were evaluated by measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, posttreatment nadir PSA level, PSA at the time of flutamide use, histological grade, recurrence-free time after firstline hormone therapy and age at the time of diagnosis.
Six of 9 cases whose post-treatment nadir PSA levels after initial hormone therapy were within the normal limit (<4 ng/ml) achieved complete remission (CR) with flutamide use, but no patient whose post-treatment nadir PSA level remained elevated achieved CR. PSA at diagnosis and PSA at the start of flutamide use were significantly lower for patients with CR. However, the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only the post-treatment nadir PSA level was significantly correlated with prognosis of flutamide use.
Flutamide use as second-line hormone therapy should be limited to cases in which first-line hormone therapy has been highly effective and for whom the post-treatment nadir PSA level was within normal limits, and other patients should undergo other therapies. By limiting flutamide use to patients in whom the effect of flutamide is considered to be maximal, the incidence of complications and medication costs can be decreased.
一些作者最近报道,最大雄激素阻断(MAB),即非甾体类抗雄激素药物氟他胺与去势或促黄体生成素释放激素类似物等传统激素疗法联合使用,对前列腺癌的疗效优于传统方法。然而,其他作者报道MAB对生存率的影响微乎其微,关于MAB的明确结论仍不明确。相反,也有人考虑在复发后使用氟他胺作为二线激素疗法,但很少有作者报道这种治疗方案是否有效或对哪些患者有效。
1995年至1997年期间,神户市立综合医院对124例前列腺癌患者进行了诊断和随访。其中22例在一线激素治疗期间出现复发,并在这些病例中使用了氟他胺。通过在诊断时测量血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、治疗后最低PSA水平、使用氟他胺时的PSA水平、组织学分级、一线激素治疗后的无复发生存时间以及诊断时的年龄,评估氟他胺的预后价值和有效性。
9例初始激素治疗后治疗后最低PSA水平在正常范围内(<4 ng/ml)的患者中有6例在使用氟他胺后实现了完全缓解(CR),但治疗后最低PSA水平仍升高的患者中无一人实现CR。CR患者诊断时的PSA和开始使用氟他胺时的PSA显著更低。然而,多因素逻辑回归分析结果表明,只有治疗后最低PSA水平与使用氟他胺的预后显著相关。
氟他胺作为二线激素疗法应仅限于一线激素治疗非常有效且治疗后最低PSA水平在正常范围内的病例,其他患者应接受其他治疗。通过将氟他胺的使用限制在认为氟他胺效果最大的患者中,可以降低并发症的发生率和药物成本。