Suppr超能文献

[两种测量方法的比较:布兰德和奥特曼评估法]

[Comparison of two measurement methods: the Bland and Altman assessment].

作者信息

Grenier B, Dubreuil M, Journois D

机构信息

Département d'anesthésie-réanimation 3, CHU de Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000 Feb;19(2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(00)00109-x.

Abstract

Bland-Altman analysis for comparison of two methods of clinical measurement is frequently used in scientific publications. This article is more appropriate than the conventional linear regression analysis. This paper gives an overview of the principles for the use of Bland-Altman analysis as well as the specific terminology attached to it. The Bland-Altman comparison analysis is mainly a tool for clinical interpretation. The bias and the agreement limits provide the variation of the values of the technique compared to the other. The difference between the two methods of measurement is plotted against the average obtained with each of the two techniques. Bland-Altman analysis can also be used to check the repeatability of a measurement technique within the same subject and to determine a repeatability coefficient. With an adaptation of the calculation of the agreement limits, the average of multiple measurements for each subject with two measurement techniques can be used for the Bland-Altman analysis.

摘要

用于比较两种临床测量方法的布兰德-奥特曼分析在科学出版物中经常被使用。本文比传统的线性回归分析更适用。本文概述了布兰德-奥特曼分析的使用原则及其相关的特定术语。布兰德-奥特曼比较分析主要是一种临床解释工具。偏差和一致性界限给出了与另一种技术相比该技术值的变化情况。将两种测量方法之间的差异与两种技术各自获得的平均值进行绘图。布兰德-奥特曼分析还可用于检查同一受试者内测量技术的重复性并确定重复性系数。通过调整一致性界限的计算,可将两种测量技术对每个受试者的多次测量平均值用于布兰德-奥特曼分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验