Smardová J, Vagunda V, Jandáková E, Vagundová M, Koukalová H, Kovarík J, Zaloudík J
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Neoplasma. 1999;46(6):384-9.
The prognostic and predictive value of p53 mutation in breast cancer is still conflicting. The choice of the p53 status detection method may account for some discrepancies. In this pilot study we compared two differently-based methods for detection of p53 alteration in 32 breast carcinoma samples: the immunohistochemical method using Bp53, DO1 and DO11 monoclonal antibodies for analysis of the p53 protein accumulation in cell nuclei and the functional method FASAY. FASAY - functional analysis of the separated alleles in yeast - tests the capability of the human p53 to transactivate a reporter with a p53 binding site RGC driving the ADE2 gene in yeast. In our group the percentage of breast cancers with accumulated p53 protein was 50%, as well as percentage of mutant p53 scored by FASAY was 50%. Although the agreement of both methods, when comparing the results of individual patients was high (94%), our results show that immunohistochemistry does not reflect the p53 status quite exactly.
p53突变在乳腺癌中的预后和预测价值仍存在争议。p53状态检测方法的选择可能是造成一些差异的原因。在这项初步研究中,我们比较了两种基于不同原理的方法来检测32例乳腺癌样本中的p53改变:一种是免疫组化方法,使用Bp53、DO1和DO11单克隆抗体分析细胞核中p53蛋白的积累;另一种是功能方法FASAY。FASAY——酵母中分离等位基因的功能分析——检测人类p53激活带有驱动酵母中ADE2基因的p53结合位点RGC的报告基因的能力。在我们的研究组中,p53蛋白积累的乳腺癌百分比为50%,通过FASAY检测到的p53突变百分比也为50%。尽管在比较个体患者的结果时,两种方法的一致性很高(94%),但我们的结果表明,免疫组化并不能非常准确地反映p53状态。