Carlson G A, Loney J, Salisbury H, Volpe R J
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, State University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-9790, USA.
J Affect Disord. 1998 Nov;51(2):113-21. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00210-9.
A total of 23 boys met DICA-P manic symptom and clustering criteria in a diagnostic investigation of 233 outpatient boys between ages 6 and 10. In this manic-symptom group, the most frequently endorsed of an average of five manic symptoms were extreme mood changes, difficulty concentrating, feeling too 'up' to sit still, and racing thoughts. Comparison groups were 23 non-manic boys seen next in the investigation and 23 non-manic boys matched to the manic-symptom boys on symptoms of three comorbid disruptive disorders (ADHD, ODD and CD). Manic-symptom boys differed significantly from next-seen boys, but not from matched comorbid boys, in number of oppositional symptoms and pervasiveness of problems. Manic-symptom boys differed significantly from next-seen boys on six of eight mother-rated RCBCL factors. In contrast, manic-symptom and matched comorbid boys did not differ on any of eight RCBCL factors, which suggests that the RCBCL differences can be attributed to shared ADHD, ODD and/or CD. However, manic-symptom and matched comorbid boys tended to differ on RCBCL Anxiety/Depression. On the teacher-rated TRF, manic-symptom boys were rated higher than next-seen boys on four internalizing factors, and higher than matched comorbid boys on two of those factors, including Anxiety/Depression. Thus, manic symptomatology also predicted substantial emotionality, which was not a controlled comorbidity. The findings of this and other studies suggest that there is a mania dimension or syndrome, which may be an indicator of true bipolar disorder--or simply a marker for disruptive comorbidity, behavioral and emotional multimorbidity, or general severity of psychopathology.
在一项针对233名6至10岁门诊男孩的诊断调查中,共有23名男孩符合DICA-P躁狂症状和聚类标准。在这个躁狂症状组中,平均五项躁狂症状中最常被认可的是情绪极端变化、注意力难以集中、感觉过于“兴奋”而无法安静坐着以及思维奔逸。对照组是调查中接下来看到的23名非躁狂男孩,以及23名在三种共病的破坏性行为障碍(注意力缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗性障碍和品行障碍)症状方面与躁狂症状男孩相匹配的非躁狂男孩。躁狂症状男孩在对立症状数量和问题普遍性方面与接下来看到的男孩有显著差异,但与匹配的共病男孩没有差异。在八项母亲评定的儿童行为检查表(RCBCL)因素中,躁狂症状男孩与接下来看到的男孩在六项因素上有显著差异。相比之下,躁狂症状男孩和匹配的共病男孩在八项RCBCL因素中的任何一项上都没有差异,这表明RCBCL差异可归因于共享的注意力缺陷多动障碍、对立违抗性障碍和/或品行障碍。然而,躁狂症状男孩和匹配的共病男孩在RCBCL焦虑/抑郁方面往往存在差异。在教师评定的儿童行为评估量表(TRF)上,躁狂症状男孩在四项内化因素上的评分高于接下来看到的男孩,在其中两项因素(包括焦虑/抑郁)上的评分高于匹配的共病男孩。因此,躁狂症状也预示着显著的情绪问题,而这并非一种受控的共病情况。这项研究及其他研究结果表明,存在一个躁狂维度或综合征,它可能是真正双相情感障碍的一个指标——或者仅仅是破坏性行为共病、行为和情绪多重共病或精神病理学总体严重程度的一个标志。