Suppr超能文献

抑郁谱系诊断

Depressive spectrum diagnoses.

作者信息

Angst J, Sellaro R, Merikangas K R

机构信息

Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 2000 Mar-Apr;41(2 Suppl 1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(00)80007-3.

Abstract

There has been widespread debate about the validity of the contemporary diagnostic classification system of depression. The major goal of this study is to examine the prognostic significance of each of the major subtypes of depression using data from 5 interviews of a 15-year prospective community-based cohort study. The stability of the following diagnostic subtypes across the duration of the study was examined: major depressive disorder (MDD), dysthymia, recurrent brief depression (RBD), and minor depression. The results show that there was little stability for the specific subtypes of depression among those who continued to manifest depression during the follow-up period; 51% of those with MDD and 44% of those with RBD met criteria for another subtype of depression. When stability was observed, the same subtype often occurred in combination with the development of another subtype. Among individuals with a single subtype, severity was greatest among those with dysthymia, whereas individuals with combined subtypes had greater severity than those with a single subtype. The lack of longitudinal stability of the diagnostic subtypes of depression suggests that depression is better expressed as a spectrum rather than a set of discrete subtypes.

摘要

关于当代抑郁症诊断分类系统的有效性一直存在广泛的争论。本研究的主要目的是利用一项为期15年的基于社区的前瞻性队列研究的5次访谈数据,检验抑郁症各主要亚型的预后意义。研究考察了以下诊断亚型在研究期间的稳定性:重度抑郁症(MDD)、恶劣心境、复发性短暂抑郁症(RBD)和轻度抑郁症。结果显示,在随访期间持续表现出抑郁症状的人群中,抑郁症的特定亚型几乎没有稳定性;51%的重度抑郁症患者和44%的复发性短暂抑郁症患者符合另一种抑郁症亚型的标准。当观察到稳定性时,同一亚型常与另一种亚型的发展同时出现。在单一亚型的个体中,恶劣心境患者的严重程度最高,而合并亚型的个体比单一亚型的个体严重程度更高。抑郁症诊断亚型缺乏纵向稳定性表明,抑郁症更宜被表述为一个谱系,而非一组离散的亚型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验