Poon R T, Fan S T, Ng I O, Wong J
Centre of Liver Diseases, Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Ann Surg. 2000 Apr;231(4):544-51. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200004000-00014.
To evaluate the influence of the width and histologic involvement of the resection margin on postoperative recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
The significance of the resection margin in hepatectomy for HCC remains controversial. A precise evaluation of the effects of the width and histologic involvement of the resection margin on postoperative recurrence is required to clarify the issue.
Two hundred eighty-eight patients with macroscopically complete resection of HCC were divided into groups with narrow (<1 cm) or wide (>/=1 cm) resection margins. The two groups were compared for postoperative recurrence rate and pattern of recurrence. A further analysis was performed to investigate the effects of histologic involvement of the resection margin on postoperative recurrence.
Recurrence rates were similar between 150 patients with a narrow margin and 138 patients with a wide margin; the groups were comparable in other clinicopathologic variables. Most recurrent tumors occurred in the liver remnant at a segment distant from the resection margin or at multiple segments. Thirty-four patients had margin involved histologically by microscopic invasion from the main tumor (n = 13), venous tumor thrombi (n = 13), or microsatellites separate from the main tumor (n = 8). These patients had significantly higher recurrence rates than those with a histologically clear margin. However, a positive histologic margin was not a significant risk factor for recurrence by multivariate analysis. Tumor stage and perioperative transfusion were the only independent risk factors.
The width of the resection margin did not influence the postoperative recurrence rates after hepatectomy for HCC. A positive histologic margin was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative recurrence, but in most patients this was related to the underlying venous invasion or microsatellites. Most intrahepatic recurrences were considered to arise from intrahepatic metastasis by means of venous dissemination, which a wide resection margin could not prevent.
评估肝细胞癌(HCC)切除术后切缘宽度及组织学受累情况对术后复发的影响。
HCC肝切除术中切缘的意义仍存在争议。需要精确评估切缘宽度及组织学受累情况对术后复发的影响以阐明该问题。
288例肉眼下HCC完全切除的患者被分为切缘窄(<1 cm)或宽(≥1 cm)两组。比较两组的术后复发率及复发模式。进一步分析以研究切缘组织学受累情况对术后复发的影响。
150例切缘窄的患者与138例切缘宽的患者复发率相似;两组在其他临床病理变量方面具有可比性。大多数复发性肿瘤发生在远离切缘的肝段或多个肝段的肝残余组织中。34例患者的切缘在组织学上因主瘤(n = 13)、静脉瘤栓(n = 13)或与主瘤分离的微卫星灶(n = 8)的微小浸润而受累。这些患者的复发率显著高于切缘组织学阴性的患者。然而,多因素分析显示组织学阳性切缘并非复发的显著危险因素。肿瘤分期和围手术期输血是仅有的独立危险因素。
HCC肝切除术后切缘宽度不影响术后复发率。组织学阳性切缘与术后复发发生率较高相关,但在大多数患者中这与潜在的静脉侵犯或微卫星灶有关。大多数肝内复发被认为是通过静脉播散的肝内转移所致,而宽切缘无法预防这种转移。