Sohn T A, Yeo C J, Cameron J L, Pitt H A, Lillemoe K D
Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287-4606, USA.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 May-Jun;4(3):258-67; discussion 267-8. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80074-8.
It has been suggested that the placement of endoscopic or percutaneous biliary stents prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy increases postoperative morbidity. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Patients undergoing preoperative biliary stenting were compared with patients who did not undergo stenting. In addition, outcomes after endoscopic and percutaneous stenting were compared. Patients who had undergone operative biliary bypass prior to pancreaticoduodenectomy were excluded from the analysis. Between January 1994 and December 1997, 567 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior operative biliary bypass. Preoperative biliary stenting was performed in 408 patients (72%), whereas the remaining 159 patients (28%) did not undergo biliary stenting. In the stented group, 64% had stents placed via a percutaneous approach and 36% had stents placed endoscopically. The stented patients were older (mean 63.1 years vs. 61.4 years; P = 0.05) and were more likely to be white (92% vs. 82%; P = 0.005). Those who had stents placed were more likely to have jaundice (67% vs. 38%; P <0.0001) and fever (5% vs. 1%; P = 0.03) as presenting symptoms. There were no differences in multiple intraoperative parameters when the two groups were compared. Patients who had stents placed had a perioperative mortality rate of 1.7% compared to 2.5% in those who did not (P = 0.3). Although the overall complication rates were 35% in those who had stents placed and 30% in those who did not (P = NS), patients with stents experienced a significantly increased incidence of pancreatic fistula (10% vs. 4%; P = 0.02) and wound infection (10% vs. 4%; P = 0.02). The incidences of other postoperative complications were similar between the stented and unstented groups. Eight patients (3%) in the percutaneously stented group developed significant hemobilia after stent placement, whereas none of the patients undergoing endoscopic stent placement developed hemobilia (P = 0.03). There were no statistical differences in other complications between the percutaneously and endoscopically stented groups. Preoperative biliary stenting did not increase the overall complication rate or mortality rate in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Stenting does appear to increase the rate of pancreatic fistula formation, possibly as a result of pancreatic inflammation related to the stenting procedure. Stenting also increases the rate of wound infection, likely secondary to contaminated bile (bactibilia) after instrumentation of the biliary tree. Preoperative biliary stenting is safe but should be used selectively because of the above-mentioned risks. The method of stenting should be based on local expertise.
有人认为,在胰十二指肠切除术前行内镜或经皮胆道支架置入会增加术后发病率。我们对前瞻性收集的数据库进行了回顾性分析。将术前接受胆道支架置入的患者与未接受支架置入的患者进行比较。此外,还比较了内镜和经皮支架置入后的结果。胰十二指肠切除术前行手术胆道旁路的患者被排除在分析之外。1994年1月至1997年12月期间,567例患者在未行术前手术胆道旁路的情况下接受了胰十二指肠切除术。408例患者(72%)接受了术前胆道支架置入,而其余159例患者(28%)未接受胆道支架置入。在支架置入组中,64%的患者通过经皮途径置入支架,36%的患者通过内镜置入支架。置入支架的患者年龄较大(平均63.1岁对61.4岁;P = 0.05),更可能是白人(92%对82%;P = 0.005)。置入支架的患者更可能以黄疸(67%对38%;P <0.0001)和发热(5%对1%;P = 0.03)为首发症状。两组术中多项参数比较无差异。置入支架的患者围手术期死亡率为1.7%,未置入支架的患者为2.5%(P = 0.3)。虽然置入支架患者的总体并发症发生率为35%,未置入支架患者为30%(P =无显著性差异),但置入支架的患者胰瘘发生率显著增加(10%对4%;P = 0.02)和伤口感染发生率显著增加(10%对4%;P = 0.02)。支架置入组和未置入组其他术后并发症的发生率相似。经皮支架置入组有8例患者(3%)在支架置入后发生严重胆道出血,而接受内镜支架置入的患者均未发生胆道出血(P = 0.03)。经皮和内镜支架置入组在其他并发症方面无统计学差异。术前胆道支架置入并未增加胰十二指肠切除术患者的总体并发症发生率或死亡率。支架置入似乎确实会增加胰瘘形成的发生率,可能是由于与支架置入操作相关的胰腺炎症。支架置入还会增加伤口感染率,可能继发于胆道树器械操作后胆汁污染(菌胆症)。术前胆道支架置入是安全的,但由于上述风险应选择性使用。支架置入方法应基于当地的专业技术。