Litvin V Iu, Korenberg E I
Parazitologiia. 1999 May-Jun;33(3):179-91.
E. N. Pavlovskiĭ's concept of natural focality of diseases and the development of general knowledge about natural foci and their structural (components), functional (mechanisms of pathogen maintenance), and ecosystem-related organization (assortment and interrelations of ecosystems) are reviewed from principal (in authors' opinion) aspects. The 60-year history of this theory includes three stages at which its scope and contents differed. At the first stage, it concerned transmissible zoonoses. It had been assumed that structurally, natural foci necessarily include the pathogen-vector-host triad, and the functioning of the focus is provided for by only pathogen circulation in terrestrial ecosystems. At the second stage, it became clear that vector is not a necessary structural component of any focus (an example of nontransmissible diseases), although the functioning of foci remained to be unequivocally attributed to the continuous pathogen circulation among animals of terrestrial ecosystems. The third stage is characterized by an understanding that, in general, the presence of a warm-blooded host in the focus is also unnecessary for pathogen survival, and natural foci can be represented by soil and aquatic ecosystems. The only necessary and specific component of any natural focus is the pathogen population. In this context, modern views on natural focality of diseases are reviewed, and the essence of the terms "natural focus" and "epizootic process" is defined. It is proposed to distinguish the phases of pathogen reservation and epizootic spread (circulation) in ecosystems of any type. The current state of this concept provides evidence that, in general biological terms, studies on natural focality of diseases belong to one of the fields of symbiotology.
本文从主要(作者认为)方面回顾了E. N. 帕夫洛夫斯基的疾病自然疫源地概念,以及关于自然疫源地及其结构(组成部分)、功能(病原体维持机制)和与生态系统相关的组织(生态系统的分类和相互关系)的一般知识的发展。该理论60年的历史包括三个阶段,其范围和内容在这三个阶段有所不同。在第一阶段,它涉及人畜共患传染病。当时认为,从结构上看,自然疫源地必然包括病原体-媒介-宿主三元组,疫源地的功能仅由病原体在陆地生态系统中的循环来维持。在第二阶段,人们清楚地认识到,媒介并非任何疫源地的必要结构组成部分(非传染性疾病的例子),尽管疫源地的功能仍明确归因于病原体在陆地生态系统动物间的持续循环。第三阶段的特点是认识到,一般来说,疫源地中温血宿主的存在对于病原体的生存也不是必需的,自然疫源地可以由土壤和水生生态系统来代表。任何自然疫源地唯一必要且特定的组成部分是病原体种群。在此背景下,回顾了关于疾病自然疫源地的现代观点,并定义了“自然疫源地”和“ epizootic process”(动物流行病过程)这两个术语的本质。建议区分病原体在任何类型生态系统中的留存阶段和动物流行病传播(循环)阶段。这一概念的当前状态表明,从一般生物学角度来看,疾病自然疫源地的研究属于共生生物学领域之一。