Suppr超能文献

国际标准化比值(INR)的临床应用。

Clinical utilization of the international normalized ratio (INR).

作者信息

Riley R S, Rowe D, Fisher L M

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0250, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2000;14(3):101-14. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(2000)14:3<101::aid-jcla4>3.0.co;2-a.

Abstract

The prothrombin time (PT) is one of the most important laboratory tests to determine the functionality of the blood coagulation system. It is used in patient care to diagnose diseases of coagulation, assess the risk of bleeding in patients undergoing operative procedures, monitor patients being treated with oral anticoagulant (coumadin) therapy, and evaluate liver function. The PT is performed by measuring the clotting time of platelet-poor plasma after the addition of calcium and thromboplastin, a combination of tissue factor and phospholipid. Intra- and interlaboratory variation in the PT was a significant problem for clinical laboratories in the past, when crude extracts of rabbit brain or human placenta were the only source of thromboplastin. The international normalized ratio (INR), developed by the World Health Organization in the early 1980s, is designed to eliminate problems in oral anticoagulant therapy caused by variability in the sensitivity of different commercial sources and different lots of thromboplastin to blood coagulation factor VII. The INR is used worldwide by most laboratories performing oral anticoagulation monitoring, and is routinely incorporated into dosage planning for patients receiving warfarin. Although the recent availability of sensitive PT reagents prepared from recombinant human tissue factor (rHTF) and synthetic phospholipids eliminated many of the earlier problems associated with the use of crude thromboplastin preparations, local instrument variability in the INR still remains a problem. Presently, the use of plasma calibrants seems the best solution to this problem. Standardizing the point-of-care instruments for INR monitoring is another dilemma faced by the industry. Ultimately, new generations of anticoagulant drugs may eliminate the need for laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant therapy.

摘要

凝血酶原时间(PT)是确定血液凝固系统功能的最重要实验室检查之一。它用于患者护理,以诊断凝血疾病、评估接受手术患者的出血风险、监测接受口服抗凝剂(香豆素)治疗的患者以及评估肝功能。PT通过在添加钙和凝血活酶(组织因子和磷脂的组合)后测量乏血小板血浆的凝血时间来进行。过去,当兔脑或人胎盘的粗提物是凝血活酶的唯一来源时,PT在实验室内部和实验室之间的差异是临床实验室的一个重大问题。20世纪80年代初世界卫生组织制定的国际标准化比值(INR)旨在消除不同商业来源和不同批次凝血活酶对凝血因子VII敏感性差异所导致的口服抗凝治疗问题。全球大多数进行口服抗凝监测的实验室都使用INR,并且它通常被纳入接受华法林治疗患者的剂量规划中。尽管最近由重组人组织因子(rHTF)和合成磷脂制备的敏感PT试剂的出现消除了许多与使用粗制凝血活酶制剂相关的早期问题,但INR在不同仪器间的差异仍然是个问题。目前,使用血浆校准物似乎是解决这个问题的最佳方法。使即时检验仪器的INR监测标准化是该行业面临的另一个难题。最终,新一代抗凝药物可能会消除对抗凝治疗进行实验室监测的需求。

相似文献

1
Clinical utilization of the international normalized ratio (INR).
J Clin Lab Anal. 2000;14(3):101-14. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2825(2000)14:3<101::aid-jcla4>3.0.co;2-a.
2
Standardization of coagulation tests.
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30 Suppl 3:79-85.
8
Standardization of Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR).
Int J Lab Hematol. 2021 Feb;43(1):21-28. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13349. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
'Fulminant hepatic failure' anesthesiologic considerations.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2025 Aug 1;38(4):503-512. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001530. Epub 2025 May 26.
3
Control-Relevant Adaptive Personalized Modeling From Limited Clinical Data for Precise Warfarin Management.
IEEE Open J Eng Med Biol. 2023 Jan 26;3:242-251. doi: 10.1109/OJEMB.2023.3240072. eCollection 2022.
4
Notes from the Field: Coagulopathy Associated with Brodifacoum Poisoning - Florida, December 2021.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Oct 7;71(40):1288-1290. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7140a5.
5
Updates in Anticoagulation Therapy Monitoring.
Biomedicines. 2021 Mar 6;9(3):262. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9030262.
6
Clinical Considerations of Coagulopathy in Acute Liver Failure.
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2020 Dec 28;8(4):407-413. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00058. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
Global Trigger Tool: Proficient Adverse Drug Reaction Autodetection Method in Critical Care Patient Units.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;24(3):172-178. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23367.
9
A Pharmacogenetically Guided Acenocoumarol Dosing Algorithm for Chilean Patients: A Discovery Cohort Study.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 6;11:325. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00325. eCollection 2020.
10
Assessment of patients' warfarin knowledge and anticoagulation control at a joint physician- and pharmacist-managed clinic in China.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 May 9;12:783-791. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S156734. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

3
Racial background is a determinant of average warfarin dose required to maintain the INR between 2.0 and 3.0.
Br J Haematol. 1999 Oct;107(1):207-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01672.x.
9
Patient self-management of oral anticoagulation.
JAMA. 1999;281(24):2283-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.24.2283-a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验