Dehio C, Gray-Owen S D, Meyer T F
Dept. Infektionsbiologie, Max-Planck-Institut für Biologie, Tübingen, Germany.
Subcell Biochem. 2000;33:61-96. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4580-1_4.
As outlined in this review, various experimental techniques have been employed in an attempt to understand neisserial pathogenesis. In vitro genetic analysis has been used to study the genetic basis for the structural variability of cell surface components. Transformed or primary epithelial cell cultures have provided the simplest model to analyze bacterial adherence and invasion, while the infection of polarized epithelial monolayers, fallopian tube and nasopharyngeal organ cultures, and ureteral tissue have each been used to more closely represent the events which occur in vivo. Finally, the in vivo infection of human volunteers with N. gonorrhoeae has provided a powerful means to confirm and expand the results obtained in vitro. By these various approaches, a number of neisserial adhesins (i.e. pilli, Opa, Opc and P36) and additional putative virulence determinants which affect bacterial adherence and invasion into host cells (i.e. LOS, capsule, PorB) have been identified. Clearly, neisserial surface variation serves as an adaptive mechanism which can modulate tissue tropism, immune evasion and survival in the changing host environment. Important progress has been made in recent years with respect to the host cellular receptors and subsequent signal transduction processes which are involved in neisserial adherence, invasion and transcytosis. This has led to the identification of (i) CD46 as a receptor for pilus which allows adherence to epithelial and endothelial cells, (ii) HSPGs, in cooperation with vitronectin and fibronectin, as receptors for a particular subset of Opa proteins and Opc, which may both mediate invasion into most epithelial and endothelial cells, and (iii) CD66 as the receptors for most Opa variants, potentially being involved in cellular interactions including adherence, invasion and transcytosis with epithelial, endothelial and phagocytic cells. As most of these data have been obtained using transformed cell lines growing in vitro, attempts must be made to translate these basic observations into a more natural situation. It can be expected that the successful ongoing integration of laboratory findings from the various infection models with human volunteer studies will further increase our understanding of the biology of neisserial infection. Perhaps the most difficult but also most rewarding challenge for the future will be to use volunteer studies to identify and understand the role of host factors which are important for the infectious process. Hopefully, insights gained from each of these studies will reveal new and useful strategies for the preventive and/or therapeutic intervention into infection and disease by these fascinating microbes.
如本综述所述,为了了解奈瑟菌的致病机制,人们采用了各种实验技术。体外基因分析已被用于研究细胞表面成分结构变异性的遗传基础。转化的或原代上皮细胞培养物为分析细菌黏附和侵袭提供了最简单的模型,而极化上皮单层、输卵管和鼻咽器官培养物以及输尿管组织的感染则分别被用于更准确地模拟体内发生的事件。最后,用淋病奈瑟菌对人类志愿者进行体内感染,为证实和扩展体外实验结果提供了有力手段。通过这些不同的方法,已经鉴定出了多种奈瑟菌黏附素(即菌毛、Opa、Opc和P36)以及其他影响细菌黏附和侵入宿主细胞的假定毒力决定因素(即脂寡糖、荚膜、孔蛋白B)。显然,奈瑟菌表面变异是一种适应性机制,可调节组织嗜性、免疫逃避以及在不断变化的宿主环境中的生存能力。近年来,在宿主细胞受体以及参与奈瑟菌黏附、侵袭和转胞吞作用的后续信号转导过程方面取得了重要进展。这导致了以下发现:(i)CD46是菌毛的受体,可使细菌黏附于上皮细胞和内皮细胞;(ii)硫酸乙酰肝素与玻连蛋白和纤连蛋白协同作用,作为特定Opa蛋白和Opc亚型的受体,它们可能都介导侵入大多数上皮细胞和内皮细胞;(iii)CD66是大多数Opa变体的受体,可能参与包括与上皮细胞、内皮细胞和吞噬细胞的黏附、侵袭和转胞吞作用在内的细胞间相互作用。由于这些数据大多是使用体外培养的转化细胞系获得的,因此必须努力将这些基本观察结果转化为更接近自然的情况。可以预期,目前正在成功地将各种感染模型的实验室研究结果与人类志愿者研究相结合,这将进一步加深我们对奈瑟菌感染生物学的理解。也许未来最困难但也是最有意义的挑战将是利用志愿者研究来识别和理解宿主因素在感染过程中的作用。希望从这些研究中获得的见解将揭示针对这些迷人微生物感染和疾病的预防和/或治疗干预的新的有用策略。